Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:10:56 -0600
JHM: What’s the price on those, please?
Employee: We have three-packs for $8.99. We also have large bags individually for $2.
JHM: Individually they’re $2?
E: Yeah, but they’re larger.
JHM: Then it … kinda sounds like the individual bags are a better deal, yeah?
E: [nervous laugh] I didn’t want to say that.
Posted in commerce | 3 Comments »
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:06:57 -0600
From Stephen King’s novel Bag of Bones:
There’s something oddly comforting about talking to a legal guy once the “billable hours” clock has started running. You have passed the magical point at which “a lawyer” becomes “your lawyer”. “Your lawyer” is warm. “Your lawyer” is sympathetic. “Your lawyer” makes notes on a yellow pad and nods in all the right places. Most of the questions “your lawyer” asks are questions you can answer. And if you can’t, “your lawyer” will find a way to help you do so, by God! “Your lawyer” is always on your side. Your enemies are his enemies. To him you are never shit but always Shinola.
This sort of seduction is probably why otherwise kind people can sit back and watch a $1200-suited bully with filed teeth tear someone else apart, and then defend the shark by saying “He came very highly recommended!” Actually, the latter is probably a different character trait. But you know who else is good at this kind of seduction? Whores. The only difference between divorce attorneys and whores appears to be that most of the latter would blush at the rates the former charge for their services.
(Yes, it’s all over [the divorce] and I’m still bitter about that fucking piece of shit asshole. That passage from Bag of Bones brought it all back. Carry on.)
Posted in people who suck, qvibepr | 3 Comments »
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:03:52 -0600
Being interviewed by a social worker today, because I’m applying for disability benefits, I was asked to “define love”.
“Huh,” I said. “I left my Keats at home.” No reaction. I thought for about thirty seconds, and then said, “A relationship in which one cares about another’s well-being more than one’s own.”
Then she asked me to “define peace”. I reflected for another half minute and settled on “A shared conviction that differences can be settled without resort to violence or cruelty.”
After a few more moments I said “I’m not sure those are very good definitions.” But she seemed pleased.
Later I realized I probably wasn’t being tested on eloquence or insight, but rather being screened for answers such as “Them’s when I cut their eyes out so they don’t look at me so funny.”
Posted in philosophy, poetry | 7 Comments »
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:33:48 -0600
A science fiction movie just explained an insect eradication technique to me: Expose males to sterilizing radiation. Then when they have offspring, the offspring will be sterile, and after a few generations the species will be extinct.
A … bit of a reasoning gap there.
Now, messing up their genome so that their offspring were not viable might work, if these modified insects were reintroduced each generation. Breeding or engineering the flies to be stronger and sterile might work, if they could compete with normal males and make the latter starve — again given that this were repeated. Or introducing a terminator gene so that offspring were sterile could be a good strategy. All sorts of hand-waves work. Just not this one.
[reference in title]
Posted in movies, science | No Comments »
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 01:59:00 -0600
Posted in site | No Comments »
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:58:44 -0600
When the used computer place sold me a refurbished Dell Latitude D810 notebook PC, they included a 65W power supply. This is apparently not the correct one: it gives me a BIOS warning that this underpowered model would not give optimal performance.
Also, unless I throttle the 2.13GHz CPU speed back to 1.33GHz or lower, the laptop will most of the time overheat, triggering an auto shutdown.
Could these be related? (Can you tell I’m not a double-E?)
Posted in computing, technology | 5 Comments »
Sun, 14 Feb 2010 23:59:00 -0600
Posted in site | No Comments »
Sun, 14 Feb 2010 21:38:09 -0600
I have disabled CAPTCHA challenge-response. Also, I’ve edited the code of the OpenID plugin so that the checkbox is unchecked by default. Good?
Posted in site | 3 Comments »
Sun, 14 Feb 2010 21:03:29 -0600
Two stories with Niall from tonight.
First, Niall, Nonna (my mom) and I were watching a cartoon:
Cartoon: I think I just cracked my Artex!
Joshua: What’s an artex?
Nonna: Must be a {seal}.
Joshua: What’s an artex seal?
Nonna: Ceiling.
Joshua: Sorry, thought you said “seal”.
Niall: A “ceiling” would be a baby seal!
Successfully hacking diminutives is such sophisticated humor for a six-year-old. Also, Artex here, but I didn’t know that at the time.
Second, while getting him out of the bath and asking what he wanted before bed:
Joshua: Do you want a story, sing you a song, …?
Niall: I want you to play me a song on the {fawoot}.
Joshua: The what?
Niall: Flute.
Joshua: Flute?
Niall: FLute.
Joshua: I don’t have a flute.
Niall: [looks at me]
Joshua: Oh, the harmonica?
Niall: Yes.
Joshua: OK, I can play you something on the harmonica.
Problem is, I only know how to solve major-key musical improvisations one way — I work myself into a corner, like you do, and need to resolve the melody line, and all my endings sound basically the same. Mozart used the first half of his career employing — “inventing” is probably closer to the truth — “discovering”? — major key endings like that, but when I try it, it just sounds like the “amen” chorus at the end of the “Johnny Appleseed” hymn.
Niall didn’t mind. Little boys are awesome.
Posted in family, humor, music, niall | 1 Comment »
Sun, 14 Feb 2010 01:59:00 -0600
Posted in site | No Comments »
Sat, 13 Feb 2010 01:59:00 -0600
Posted in site | No Comments »
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:41:00 -0600
Oh, hello. mcgees.org just turned ten years old — on 2010-01-18. I had been so focused on the blog’s tenth birthday that I forgot this one. So the aforementioned “Definitive Songs” project I will issue as a CD, in a limited edition, to the contributors of the first 80 minutes of tracks, and I’ll distribute it free to the people who contribute to the list. This also suggests I should cap the track length. 8 minutes?
With the speed at which I work, they should be ready — round about 2010-12-15, the tenth anniversary of the blog.
Posted in music, site | No Comments »
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:54:04 -0600
I maybe could have come up with a better topic for a post than an out-of-office president’s standardized test scores, but I just discovered this in article at Wikipedia on George W. Bush:
Though no official “IQ” test score for Bush has been found, the score he received on his SAT during his final year of prep school at the exclusive Phillips Academy in Andover, Massachusetts is known. He scored 1206, which has been correlated to an I.Q. of 120. The score that Bush received on his qualifying test for the military suggests that his IQ was in the mid 120’s, placing him in the 95th percentile of the population … An article published in the journal Political Psychology, estimated Bush’s IQ at 125. The same study estimated the IQ of Bush’s predecessor Bill Clinton at 149. … A lecturer in American politics at Warwick University said: “…[H]e is by no means a dimwit.”
OK, taking this apart. First, Bill Clinton should have been assumed to have a disadvantage due to his lower socioeconomic bracket in his youth. All else between them is roughly commensurate: they were both WASPs of about the same age living in roughly the same part of the country, so bias should presumably be roughly commensurate. Whatever the I.Q. test is measuring — and it is measuring something, it simply fails to reduce absolute “intelligence” to a scalar — it puts Clinton way out in front. For most I.Q. tests, σ=16. Cross referencing this with the claims in the cited article show that this is the σ value being used (play with this to find out why.)
Points:
- Bush is at 1.6σ, Clinton is at 3+σ. This is statistically huge.
- Clinton’s 3σ is 99.9th percentile. That’s “smarter” than 999 in a thousand people. Is this starting to sound more like a president to you? More to the point, perhaps, is it starting to sound more like — Clinton’s estimated IQ by one single paper in a psychology journal? [And mcgees.org zooms off in a different direction! Anyone still reading this far? Anyone comment before reading this far?]
- Zooming still — why the fuck do we care so much about the answer to this question? It shows up all over the Internet. Obama hasn’t released any scores, so far as I can tell, and people have estimated his IQ at between — 116 and 160. Gee, that’s useful! Tell you what: give me your estimate, and I’ll tell you for whom you voted.
- Bill Clinton did better on his SATs than George W. Bush did. Great. I believe I beat both of them. Does that mean that I should have been president instead of Bill Clinton? Not remotely. Not only because I was 14 years old at the time, either. So much more than (trivial) math problems and (fairly trivial) analogy questions are required for someone to head the Executive branch. Gah. Isn’t this completely obvious? One needs to work well in crisis, to manage people, to handle public attention well, to get by on little sleep, to be responsive when required, to keep a great deal of information in one’s head, to … well, it’s starting not to sound like George W. again, is it not? But that’s just snark. The whole idea of reducing something as complex as “intelligence” to a single number — and then pretending that corresponds with the ability to lead a fucking country — is lunacy. I therefore request you to:
- Read Stephen Jay Gould’s The Mismeasure of Man. I have been strongly anti-I.Q. since reading it in college. I left Mensa upon reading it (in that year of great self-examination, I left the church as well).
Here’s something that is valid, though:
- Bush’s SAT scores put him in the 95th percentile. Good. That’s one in twenty. A thinking person probably should not put all that much in the number. But you know who does do such things? Schools.
- Schools. Since when does “one in twenty” get you into the Ivy League? I mean, unless you have a famous legacy father and grandfather? What might one expect of someone literally grandfathered into Yale?
- I’d expect “gentleman’s Cs”. Which is what Bush got. This is because the thing most accurately measured by the SAT is, perhaps, how well one takes tests.
- I’ve taken my 1590 SAT scores and my 148-150 IQ as carte blanche to write about how dumb I think reliance on these tests is. Whatever else may motivate me, the grapes are sweet.
(The intended title of the post was “The IQ Obsession”, but that rather gives the game away, yes?)
Posted in politics | 2 Comments »
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:49:10 -0600
Zombies of Mass Destruction comes in at sixth out of eight in my ranking of this year’s Horrorfest.
Show/Hide synopsis
In this horror comedy, the residents of and visitors to a small conservative island in Washington state are forced to deal with an outbreak of zombie-ism as the outcasts are blamed for the occurrence.
Show/Hide spoilers
Inhabitants of a small island start turning into contagious zombies. Among our heroes are a gay couple who have come to the island for one of the pair to come out to his mother; a young, fully Americanized woman of Iranian descent who faces ostracism in the community; an overweight and bumbling teen who has a crush on the young woman; and a liberal hippy type who is running for mayor against the long-entrenched conservative.
When the zombie infection begins, the residents seem unaware that anything is wrong in their town, studiously failing to notice the change in their neighbors. The couple at the mother’s house see her becoming a zombie in front of their eyes, but believe the reaction is due to the information that her son is gay. When it reaches critical mass, people start being bitten and eaten in the streets. The gay couple and the woman running for mayor hide out in a conservative church with the church’s pastor, the congregants assembled for bingo night, and the conservative mayor. The young woman is taken captive by the redneck father of the teen, who ties her up and, in a light-hearted comedy romp, begins to torture her to find out what she knows about an Iraqi [sic] plot to overtake the island, as the woman tries to show the man that his wife (the teen’s mother) has become a zombie already. Meanwhile, at the church, the pastor tries to “rehabilitate” the gay men by use of a series of films.
Eventually all escape, emergency medical teams arrive, and the zombie infestation is stopped. After a cut to “29 Weeks Later”, the gay men invite the young Iranian woman to return with them to Manhattan, which she refuses, having decided to take over her (late, due to the zombies) father’s restaurant. The liberal woman has become an arch-conservative, is elected mayor, and insists that a DHS presence be established on the island.
Show/Hide review
Yeah. It tries. Hard. Really hard. And at its best it is quite amusing, with several laugh-out-loud moments. But the genre of comedy zombie movies is throughly saturated, with the top tier including
Braindead and
Zombieland, and the second tier
Shaun of the Dead and
Black Sheep. And, at the highest, this film is third tier.
The message of the film is a bit lost on me: strongly pro-liberal throughout, I was confused by the flight to conservatism by multiple characters at the end. I wasn’t sure if this were being promoted, or simply observed, and if the latter, whether or not this were believable.
In a weaker year this movie would fare better in my ranking, but this is a very good year, and this comedic gore-fest falls mostly flat. I would give this one a pass.
Show/Hide bright spots
The film is, as noted, quite amusing in parts. The choice of gay-rehab videos, and the gay men’s bewildered response to them (”This is supposed to be homoerotic?”) is wonderful. The inquisition of the young woman of Iranian parents is very funny: the redneck asks her why there are 13 stripes on the US flag. When she answers correctly, he takes this as proof of her being foreign, as almost no high school-educated American would know the answer to this. Pretty
Janette Armand, in her debut role, is very funny as the young woman. And the scene in which the couple fail to notice that the mother has turned into a zombie is at points hilarious.
All Horrorfest reviews
Posted in horrorfest, movies | 3 Comments »
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:02:45 -0600
“Riding atop a black horse” is one of the best metaphors for depression I’ve ever heard.
Hold On
I was drawn
Riding atop a black horse
Whatever prize there was,
I could only observe
Where the trouble starts.
Where does it end?
How can I be cured …
How, before it ends?
I know life would be different if I held on. Held on.
I know I could be something if I held on
Gave her life away
Put it in my pocket when it should have been framed
Oh, I lost its shine
Gotta get this out of my head
Out of my bed
How could it end …
End like this?
How could it end?
I know life would be different had I held on. Held on.
I know I could be something had I held on. Held on.
I know I could be something if I held on. Held on.
I know life would be different if I held on. Held on!
Held on. Held on. If I …
Held on. Held on. If I …
Held on. Held on. If I …
Held on. Held on.
All Vedder Tuesday
Posted in music, pearl jam, vedder tuesday, why I wish Vedder wouldn't mumble | No Comments »
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:59:00 -0600
Posted in site | No Comments »
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:32:33 -0600
I was listening to [music] today, and I thought “This is my definitive piece of music. If someone understands this, he or she will be most of the way to understanding me.” And then I wondered if this were hopeless affect and, regardless of the answer to that, whether other people felt the same way about a given song/track/piece/whatever. People always ask for definitive book, but I haven’t seen or heard this posed. So: any submissions? After a useful number are submitted, I’ll reveal mine. “Show me yours”, in other words.
Posted in music | 38 Comments »
Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:34:10 -0600
Here is my photographic study of my Dad from today, with suboptimal equipment, entitled “Have You Seen My Reindeer?”

Posted in art, family | 3 Comments »
Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:59:00 -0600
Posted in site | No Comments »
Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:47:59 -0600
I rate The Graves seventh out of eight in this year’s Horrorfest, and the lowest-rated for simply being a bad film.
Show/Hide synopsis
Two horror-and-comic fangirl sisters take a last road trip together before the elder moves to New York to take up a high-paying job. They end up touring an old mining town where they are stalked by people trying to kill them as a sacrifice to an underground demon.
Show/Hide spoilers
The Graves sisters get lost trying to find the world’s largest thermometer and end up in an out-of-the-way town where (of course) there is no cell phone reception. They go to a diner, where a creepy preacher, whom they previously heard preaching fire and brimstone on the radio and played by horror veteran Tony Todd, clearly has everyone in his thrall, including a woman with him who appears his captive. Directed to an alternative attraction by the waitress — a ghost town built around an old mine — they face “The Blacksmith”, clothed in a cowl and welding glasses, who kills unwary tourists with a hammer.
Successfully defeating this killer, they run to the road for help, having been joined by one or two other escapees. They stop a pickup truck driven by another man who questions their story, insisting on examining the crime scene. This is a pretense to lure them back into the ghost town, as it is revealed that the man is the late blacksmith’s elder brother. This man kills the other one or two characters (honestly can’t remember how many) leaving the young women to flee again.
Defeating this killer, they return to the town for assistance, and are taken captive by the preacher’s congregants. Returned to the ghost town, the women are prepared to be sacrificed to an evil spirit who lives in the mines, a spirit that in turn possesses the preacher and members of his congregation. Assisted in their escape by the woman previously seen to be the preacher’s captive, they successfully escape following the supposed death of the town citizens. The sisters drive away happily, with the younger sister deciding to accompany the elder to New York, and the citizens of the town are reanimated to continue their reign of terror on future tourists.
Show/Hide review
This is a tedious and hackneyed attempt at subverting the slasher genre. Featuring strong and successful female leads, the slashers are slashed, the day won, and the sisters empowered. Hurrah!
Except it is a horrible film. To begin with, it is beyond credulity that anyone would remain in the town depicted in the initial diner scene, despite the attempted sell of the elder sister being a huge horror nut, and even futher out that they would return to it for help. The costuming of the killers is an unintentional parody of the genre, the motivations indistinct, the group possession scene (in the scrolling credits, most of the film crew are listed as extras) laughable. Tony Todd’s performance is horrible, leagues beyond the “so bad it’s good” that he was apparently trying for. The second false escape tries the viewer’s patience. The lighting and sets are abysmal, the acting by all cast members except the younger sister is lousy, and the presumed attempt at self-aware camp registering as simple incompetence. Avoid this one.
Show/Hide bright spots
Pretty Jillian Murray is perfect as younger sister Abby. Having lead female characters who are fangirls is fun. The rock music chosen for the film is very good. And victorious, strong female characters is much better than the alternative.
All Horrorfest reviews
Posted in horrorfest, movies | 4 Comments »
Sun, 07 Feb 2010 10:54:43 -0600
Super, super late this week. Sorry.
Love Boat Captain
Is this just another day, this God-forgotten place?
First comes love and then comes pain. Let the games begin.
Questions rise and answers fall, insurmountable.
Love Boat Captain
Take the reigns and steer us towards the clear, here.
It’s already been sung, but it can’t be said enough:
All you need is love
Is this just another phase of earthquakes making waves?
Trying to shake the cancer off? Stupid human beings!
Once you hold the hand of love it’s all surmountable.
Hold me, and make it the truth
That when all is lost there will be you
‘Cause to the universe I don’t mean a thing
And there’s just one word I stil believe
And it’s …
It’s an art to live with pain. Mix the light into gray
Lost nine friends we’ll never know two years ago today
And if our lives became too long, would it add to our regret?
And the young, they can lose hope ’cause they can’t see beyond today
The wisdom that the old can’t give away
Constant recoil, sometimes life don’t leave you alone
Hold me, and make it the truth
That when all is lost there will be you
‘Cause to the universe I don’t mean a thing
And there’s just one word that I still believe and it’s
“Love”
Love. love. love. love
Love boat captain
Take the reigns and steer us towards the clear
I know it’s already been sung but it can’t be said enough
Love is all you need
All you need is love
Love, love
Love
Posted in music, pearl jam, vedder tuesday, why I wish Vedder wouldn't mumble | No Comments »
Sun, 07 Feb 2010 01:59:00 -0600
Posted in site | No Comments »
Sat, 06 Feb 2010 01:59:00 -0600
Posted in site | No Comments »
Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:22:13 -0600
In my tabulation, The Final comes in at 8th place — the worst out of eight. It gets this honor not because it is a bad film — which it is — but because it is completely unacceptable.
Show/Hide synopsis
A group of outcast high school students, tired of being tormented at school, hatch a plan to crash a student party to exact vengeance on the tormentors.
Show/Hide spoilers
Seizing control of the party, the outcasts drug the punch in order to incapacitate the oppressors, chain them in irons, and begin to systematically torture them. The group had waffled over following through with the plan as a sympathetic student, who wasn’t supposed to be at the party, turned up. Most agreed that he was “meant to be there” if he was there. One of the outcasts frees this student, who runs into the woods. The outcast’s fellows knife him to death for the action.
As the sympathetic student — a black kid — tries to plead with a redneck who has taken him captive for help, the oppressed embark on a series of grisly tortures on the oppressors, including enticing certain of them with freedom if they are willing to amputate their fellow students’ fingers with gardening shears. The putative leader of the outcasts, played very poorly by Marc Donato, gives overwrought and melodramatic speeches overlooking the dance floor, at one point donning a black trenchcoat.
When the police arrive, finally summoned by the sympathetic student who has been able to convince the redneck to help, the oppressed commit suicide. The sympathetic student returns to school, and the filmmakers make clear that there are still oppressors-to-be lurking there.
Show/Hide review
This is completely fucking unacceptable as a film. Intentionally drawing on imagery of (at least the collective national mythos of) Columbine, the film attempts a sympathetic portrayal of picked-upon students who arrange to torture and kill their peers. Registering as a brutal revenge fantasy on the part of the filmmakers, we’re supposed to identify with the oppressed and, I guess, cheer for them.
Fuck. That. Shit.
This is not something that one can do in a movie, especially one targeted at the demographics most interested in horror features. Not fucking cool. Ten years after (the mythologized, yes) Columbine, Stephen King’s early masturbatory fantasy of teen retribution Rage (written pseudonymously with a desired title of Getting It On) is just barely acceptable. The Korn song “Faget” [sic] is probably not. And this piece of shit registers off the charts into unacceptable territory. The filmmakers should be ashamed at this inept, offensive, and possibly-dangerous film, and After Dark Films should be likewise ashamed. Fuck them. Gah.
Show/Hide bright spots
Emily, played brilliantly by beautiful newcomer Lindsay Seidel, is the closest to evoking sympathy among the oppressed. As for other bright spots … um? Hmm.
I think it will be the case that people with email notifications will see the synopses in the clear, so I hope that doesn’t cause problems for those who want to see the films. If it does on this first one, don’t read the snippets in the subsequent emails, instead visiting the site directly.
Posted in horrorfest, movies | 2 Comments »
Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:59:00 -0600
Posted in site | No Comments »
Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:50:52 -0600
As previously mentioned, I was eagerly awaiting the fourth year of the After Dark Horrorfest, an annual festival showcasing eight independent horror films. I enjoyed it — a lot — as I expected. But I thought I would write this post, which elaborates on:
Horror movies are one of the most trope-drenched genres of art that exist. There is nothing inherently wrong about this — impressionist symphonic music is too, for instance — but one will sometimes watch an entire film for one key moment in which conventions are upended. And, of course, recognition requires that one is familiar with the conventions in the first place.
Horror films were an Immersion Project for me, and one that I stuck with after the year. I’m a huge fanboy now. But I think it would be funny to tabulate the occurrence of tropes in these films. There are probably both false positives and false negatives in the list, but I expect their occurrence is less than 10% — which we’ll find out if another fanboy critiques my list.
The films are:
D: Dread
H: Hidden
LM: Lake Mungo
KT: Kill Theory
TF: The Final
TG: The Graves
TR: The Reeds
Z: Zombies of Mass Destruction
| Film |
D |
H |
LM |
KT |
TF |
TG |
TR |
Z |
| Young white people in peril |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
| — With exactly one young character beloning to a racial minority |
|
|
|
✔ |
✔ |
|
✔ |
✔ |
| Blood as makeup |
✔ |
✔ |
|
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
| — That causes serious continuity problems due to insufficient storyboarding |
✔ |
|
|
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
| Changing characters’ eyes, in a fashion that would have been difficult before cheap CGI |
|
|
✔ |
✔ |
|
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
| Establishing at the start of the film that there is no mobile phone reception |
|
✔ |
|
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
|
| Rock music |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
| — Rap music |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Excessive drinking |
✔ |
✔ |
|
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
|
| Gore |
✔ |
✔ |
|
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
| — Excessive gore |
✔ |
|
|
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
| —— Really fucking excessive gore |
|
|
|
✔ |
|
✔ |
|
✔ |
| ——— That will be worse if there’s an unrated cut |
|
|
|
✔ |
|
✔ |
|
✔ |
| Murder of a good guy by a supposed good guy |
✔ |
✔ |
|
✔ |
✔ |
|
✔ |
✔ |
| Stock character identity communicated to audience by makeup and/or wardrobe |
✔ |
|
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
|
✔ |
| Eye trauma |
|
✔ |
|
✔ |
|
✔ |
|
✔ |
| Supernatural events and/or agents |
|
|
✔ |
|
|
✔ |
✔ |
|
| A killer with sadistic proclivities |
✔ |
✔ |
|
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
| Character impaled |
|
✔ |
|
✔ |
✔ |
|
✔ |
✔ |
| Don’t trust someone with a drawl |
|
|
|
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
|
✔ |
| Assault with an unusual weapon |
✔ |
✔ |
|
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
| — That is unusual because it is actually a gardening tool |
|
|
|
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
| Contemplative characters tend to survive longer |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
| Torture |
✔ |
|
|
✔ |
✔ |
|
✔ |
|
| Locking a window or a glass door is supposed to provide protection |
|
✔ |
|
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
| Human caught in an animal trap |
|
|
|
✔ |
✔ |
|
✔ |
✔ |
| Main characters who are outcasts |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
|
✔ |
| Gratuitous boobage |
✔ |
|
|
✔ |
✔ |
|
|
|
| A horror veteran as a ringer |
|
|
✔ |
|
|
✔ |
|
✔ |
| Moody lighting |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
|
✔ |
|
| Big spooky house |
✔ |
✔ |
|
✔ |
✔ |
|
|
✔ |
| A sting consisting of someone leaping in front of a car |
|
✔ |
|
✔ |
|
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
| Menace conveyed by someone wearing a hood |
|
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
|
| The horror is not over at the end of the film |
✔ |
|
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
| Tries way too hard |
✔ |
✔ |
|
|
✔ |
|
|
✔ |
| Actually scary |
✔ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So, eight films, all these tropes, and $100 later, will I go to next year’s festival? Hellz yeah.
I want to write longer reviews of these, but I’d like input on the reviews’ format. More inside.
Posted in movies | 2 Comments »
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 01:16:58 -0600
… and no antibiotics yet. Do please excuse any delay in responding to emails.
Posted in medical | 2 Comments »
Fri, 29 Jan 2010 01:59:00 -0600
Posted in site | No Comments »
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:02:28 -0600
Wow! Twenty-one!
I’m in a place today where I can post lyrics to this song without (probably) crying — shout-out to those intimate enough to grok that, and a louder one to those who know why — so I should take the chance.
The End
What were all those dreams we shared
Those many years ago?
What were all those plans we made
Now left beside the road?
Behind us in the road?
More than friends, I always pledged
‘Cause friends they come and go
People change, as does everything
I wanted to grow old
Just want to grow old
Slide on next to me!
I’m just a human being
I will take the blame,
But just the same
This is not me
You see
Believe
I’m better than this
Don’t leave me so cold!
Or buried beneath the stones!
I just want to hold on
And know I’m worth your love
Enough
I don’t think
There’s such a thing
It’s my fault, now I’ve been caught
A sickness in my bones
How it pains to leave you here
With the kids on your own
Just don’t let me go!
Help me see myself
‘Cause I can no longer tell
Looking out from the inside of
The bottom of a well
I yell –
It’s hell –
But no one hears
Before I disappear
Whisper in my ear
Give me something to echo
In my unknown future’s ear
My dear –
The End –
Comes near –
I’m here –
But not much longer
[Fuck. Ed, you bastard. So close to making it without tears. And you ended an album with this.]
In the immortal words of Johnson, “I remain, &c.“,
Vedder Tuesday
[No, really, Johnson would literally write "I remain, &c.."]
Posted in music, pearl jam, vedder tuesday, why I wish Vedder wouldn't mumble | 1 Comment »
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:59:00 -0600
Posted in site | 1 Comment »