Loch Dhu 10 year old (Mannochmore distillery)

Distillery bottling, 40% a.b.v.




Labelled "The Black Whisky", and meant to appeal to a younger market than usually consumes whisky (such as me, I suppose.)  It's not so much black as the color of an equal mixture of espresso and blood.  The nose is closed, unexpressive, slightly charred.  The palate is blatantly offensive.  There is something unmistakably wrong with it.  It tastes like cigar ashes mixed with vodka and moldy blackberry jam.  The only nice note is in the background, with some hints of dark chocolate covered espresso beans.  But it's the finish that really gets you, actually making me recoil, grimace, and frantically shake my head.  It's nauseating.  It tastes spoiled.  It's unbelivable that it was commercially marketed.  One understands at once where the rumor of "a production accident at Mannochmore" came from.  If you ever have tasted, say, an old dumpy Cadenhead that sat with a faulty cork for twenty years on a hot, dusty shelf, you know what you are in for.  It tastes ruined in the bottle, contaminated.  And I assure you, it's not just my bottle.

For the sake of science and journalism I tasted it again for you, my readers, just to write these notes.  You can see the sacrifices I undertake for you.  And before the nut jobs out there ask, yes, I know where you can get it.  Check ScotchFinder.  Against all possible logic it is now a collector's item, and Sukhinder at The Whisky Exchange has it for $170.  Enjoy.

Suggested for: Never, ever.  But there's no accounting for taste, as they say, so if you like it, more power to you.

Updated 2007-12-04: Woohoo! More fan mail. This you've got to read:

With all dhu respect, your review of Loch Dhu proves to me that you either never tried it (but perhaps thought you did) or your taste buds, nose and eyes are sadly impaired) - or - you're just trying to be funny with your wild exaggerations.

Whether you like the scotch or not, your descriptions are absurd. The nose is anything but "closed, unexpressive, slightly charred". It has a pleasant bouquet albeit not especially nuanced. Slightly charred? You're supposed to sniff it and drink it - not stare at it. Even then, it doesn't really look "charred", just black - and not, by the way, the color of espresso and blood. Did you think you were waxing poetic when you said that? - or funny? - or both? - or how about neither? And what were you attempting to be with the almost laughable exaggerations, "like cigar ashes mixed with vodka and moldy blackberry jam". Oh, how clever. I'm sure you have an intimate knowledge of those tastes. Interesing that you would find such unimagineable horrors lurking within this pleasant little single malt scotch whiskey with the very smooth and velvety feel, and a lightness of taste belied by its darkness of color (black).

But there's more - and here it sounds like something written by a 12-year-old. The finish made you recoil, grimace, and frantically shake your head?! It's nauseating?! It tastes spoiled?! Oh, really?! Are you the author of that children's Halloween poem, "Great green gobs of greasy, grimy gopher guts"?

To quote Debra Barone in "Everybody Loves Raymond", Who's the nut job now...? Who's the nut job now?

He signed himself "Ron", and put down his address as iogle@usa.com. Don't know if it's valid or not. But if you were wondering whether there were people on the planet who liked this malt, Ron has your answer, even if it's the opinion of one who doesn't know that scotch whisky is spelled without an e, cannot punctuate to save his life, and uses Everybody Loves Raymond as a source of inspiration.


Return to list