Archive for the 'finance' Category

Valuing the value-transcendent

Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:40:20 -0500

I watch Antiques Roadshow.  I can usually only stomach the original, British version, not the horrid American knock-off.  Frequently someone will bring in a family piece — say, a portrait of a relative from Georgian times, or a needlework sampler that a greatn-grandmother composed in the early 19th Century C.E. — and will ask after its value.

Now, establishing an auction value makes sense for these: that establishes what items like it, in comparable condition, fetch to when sold to someone else with an interest in art.  But the valuers will go on to give a higher value for insurance purposes, which is supposed to be a “replacement value”.

Replacement?  What could that possibly mean?  Surely you aren’t going to go out and find another portrait of your ancestor, right?  Another sampler that a distant forebear created?  No, it probably means a contemporary of what you have — a portrait of someone else, or a sampler by someone else.

This baffles me.  Why bother?  If it’s Revere Silver, and there are other, more-or-less identical items on the market, “replacement value” make sense.  But the literally irreplaceable, the one-of-a-kind items?  When they’re gone, they’re gone.

My former boss (Jeff, if you’re reading, it was your father) once talked to me about an insurance agent approaching him about insuring his children.  He was likewise dumbfounded.  As he saw it, the argument seemed to be that, if his child died, it would take a lot of money to make up for it.  This is nonsense.  There is not a figure (in dollars) I would accept in exchange for Niall — there may not even be a figure in lives I would exchange for his.  That’s not big-U Utilitarian, but it is how I think.  Heirlooms like the cassette tapes that my family recorded for my Nana, which I now have safely in my possession and will be encoding to digital form, don’t make sense to insure.  There is no accounting for ancestry.  de la Rocha lyrics come to mind: “Sell your history for a VCR.”  No thanks.  You keep your VCR, I’ll keep my heirlooms, please.

Financial news

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 01:44:11 -0500

In other news, the Euro topped $1.50, the Pound topped $2, and oil topped $107/barrel.

Anyone want to join me in a stirring round of “And I’m Proud To Be An American”?

Germany, 1923

Sun, 02 Mar 2008 22:14:59 -0600

Stories about the rigors of life in Germany are plentiful.  Economic disaster ensued when the Allied Reparation Commission required Germany to pay a whopping 132 billion gold marks in reparations for World War 1 — Janet Klug, Linn’s Stamp News, 25 February 2008.

Whopping?  132 billion gold marks sounds like a lot, but so does 132 billion Turkish “old” Lira.  This is an example of the type of  information searches philately spurs:

What’s was the buying power of 132 billion gold marks in 1921?  A thousand homes?  The Louvre?  All of Liechtenstein?

Let’s start with a Google search for germany inflation 1923 wikipedia and look at the first match:

The total reparations demanded was 132,000,000,000 gold marks which was far more than the total German gold or foreign exchange.  An attempt was made by Germany to buy foreign exchange, but that was paid in treasury bills and commercial debts for Marks which only increased the speed of devaluation.

Um, OK.  You bill the country more than its entire net worth?  Had no idea.  Yikes.  The article also states:

The German currency was relatively stable at about 60 Marks per US Dollar during the first half of 1921.

Have I mentioned I love Google?  People were talking about the “Information Age” decades ago, but Google has gotta define it.  Anyway, a search for dollar historical buying power in Google, and, again, the first match: Historical Currency Conversions.  A little division, and we put “2 billion 200 million” into the form, and choose “dollars” (yes, you can spell out your amounts like that.)  The answer: 4.7 x 1018 (4.7E18) dollars in today’s buying power!

This post will be useful for students, so I will avoid profanity at this moment.  But, man!  That’s almost 5 sextillion dollars!  The U.S. GDP (thanks, Google!) was 13 trillion in 2006.  That’s 350,000 years’ worth of the U.S. economy!

Someone please tell me I made a decimal point error somewhere, or that the people at Historical Currency Conversions are full of it.  Sextillions of dollars?

Forget Liechtenstein!  There’s not a continent you couldn’t buy for that kind of money!

What were “we” thinking?  Did we really think this wouldn’t trigger another, worse war?

Amazon/UPS Deal

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:07:21 -0600

OK, so, Amazon, yeah?  As discussed previously, Amazon apparently have some sweetheart (but non-exclusive) deal with UPS.  I verified this with the franchise owner of “my” UPS Store, who seems to know what he’s talking about.  What kind of deal?

Well, I’m an Amazon Prime member.  I went in for a “free trial”.  I gave them a credit card number, but they promised they would contact me for permission before converting me to a paid member.  They didn’t.  Flat out, they didn’t.  They lied about it.  They went ahead and charged my credit card for a year in advance.  It’s something like $80 per year.

Sneaky.  But, best deal out there.  It gives you free two-day shipping on practically everything Amazon carry, and the option to upgrade to overnight shipping for US$3.99 per item.  $3.99!  Let’s do some research:

I ordered a three-pound item today through Amazon, in the afternoon.  It will be here tomorrow, by “Next Day Air Saver”, which differs from “Next Day Air” by giving the driver an extra five hours to get you the package, for which I paid the aforementioned $3.99.  They shipped it from their location in Sparks, Nevada.

I played with UPS’s online tool.  I said I was located in 89431, was shipping to a commercial address in 91107, that I had a daily UPS pickup, and that I would give my package to the driver.  I was using my own packaging, and I low-balled the dimensions as 10″×6″×4″.  It’s almost certainly bigger than that, in reality.  And the retail cost, for mere mortal companies?  Want to guess?  Here take a moment.

… When in the course of human events it are you ready? …

$43.57.  $43.57!  For one package, one time!  Surely Amazon Prime subscribers aren’t paying $80 per year and just not using it, right?  How is this remotely profitable for Amazon?  If I were a shareholder, I’d be throwing a fit until I got some numbers.  Are they getting an 80% discount from UPS?  I can’t see how that would be possible, and nothing else would seem to make the numbers line up.

Someone at UPS or Amazon, please post anonymously and give the answer.  How much are Amazon paying for this?

Cooking poor

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:21:29 -0600

Not poorly.  It was delicious.  But poor.

I have very little income right now, being disabled, out of work, with no disability checks coming in.  I invited my mom over for dinner tonight.  The menu: Sloppy Joes and wine. 

Not an American?  Sloppy Joes are comfort food, frequently (at least when I was growing up) served as school lunch.  Wikipedia: “There is probably no Joe after whom it is named — but … “Joe” is a name that suggests, to an American, a person of proletarian character and unassailable genuineness.”  Can’t beat that with a stick.  Er, switch.  Er, Louisville Slugger.

Ingredients sourced at the 99¢ Only store and low-cost Valu Mart grocery store.  So I worked it out: she had half a hamburger bun, lean beef, sloppy joe sauce, Tabasco Chipotle sauce (yum!), and half a glass of wine (she’s watching her diet.)  $0.72.  Very low in fat, high in protein, and not too bad in the way of sodium.

I feel like Thoreau, detailing cent-by-cent analyses of what it’s like to live simply.  I’m not about to start leaving my front door open or anything, but it’s awfully rewarding to do something like that.

ashpinctersayswhat?

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:06:18 -0600

Not actually any clearer than the source documents.  The IRS speaks a completely different dialect of English than I do.  Could someone try to parse the following “explanation”?

NOTE: Thank you for your inquiry.  Our response to your tax law question appears below. I hope this information has been helpful.  If you have a follow-up question or another general tax law question, please return to our web site at: (http://www.irs.gov) to submit it.  Please do not use your “reply” button to respond to this message.  More helpful information is provided at the end of this message.

Your Question Was:
I purchased a jacket for $40 in the year 2000.  I wore it but kept it in good condition.  In 2007, I sold it through my eBay business, as a used item, for $20.  How do I calculate basis and profit/loss on the jacket?

The Answer To Your Question Is:
Thank you for your inquiry. I apologize for any delay in this response. I understand you purchased a jacket for $40 in the year 2000.  You explained that you wore it but kept it in good condition.  In 2007, you sold it through your online auction business, as a used item, for $20.  I understand you want to know how to calculate your profit or loss and basis and on the jacket.

I assume you were a United States citizen as of the last day of 2007. I assume your business is a Sole Proprietorship. I assume you are not a minister. I assume you do not belong to a religion that is opposed to Insurance or Social Security. I assume you did not earn any Form W-2 wages in tax year 2007. I assume you would have a net profit of at least $400 from your online business. I assume this jacket is not a collectible. I assume your business regularly purchases items for resale and you want to include your sale of personal items in that business. I assume you do not take an expense for inventory. I assume you did not make Estimated Tax payments.

The basis of property you buy is usually its cost. The cost is the amount you pay for it in cash, debt obligations, other property or services. Cost includes sales tax and other expenses connected with the purchase.

Before calculating gain or loss on a sale, you must usually determine the adjusted basis of that property. Certain events that occur during your period of ownership may increase or decrease your basis, resulting in an “adjusted basis”. Increase your basis by items such as the cost of improvements that add to the value of the property, and decrease it by items such as insurance reimbursements for casualty and theft losses. When personal property is converted to business property, the basis for depreciation is the lesser of the following amounts; the FMV of the property on the date of the change or your adjusted basis on the date of the change. For more information on basis and adjusted basis, refer to Publication 551, Basis of Assets.

When reporting this income you may download the Form 1040 Schedule C, Profit or Loss from Business (Sole Proprietorship), Form 1040, Schedule SE, Self-Employment Tax and the Publication 334, Tax Guide for Small Business.

The net Form 1040 Schedule C profit is reported for income and self-employment social security tax purposes regardless of any draw. A sole proprietor files Form 1040, Schedule C and possibly Form Schedule SE. Include the $40 sale price of this jacket with your gross income and your basis as an “Other Expense” with a written explanation on the dotted lines of the Schedule C. The Schedule C is a profit and loss statement. If the net profit from self-employment is $400 or more, then you need to calculate Social Security/Medicare self-employment tax on Schedule SE. Use the Schedule C net profit and complete Schedule SE. Basically, sole proprietors file Schedule C only for years they have income and expenses from a business. In the future you may be able to participate in the optional method. This method allows you to claim more earnings as they are reported to the Social Security Administration. To participate in the optional method you must have net earnings of at least $400 in at least two out of the last three years. If you will meet these conditions and you are interested in the optional method, you will have to fill out the back of the Schedule SE. You may have to pay your tax liability through the payment of estimated taxes. If the increase in your income and increase in your tax causes you to owe more than $1,000 with your tax return, you could be liable for an estimated tax penalty, unless your withholdings and payment amounts are within certain percentages. If you do owe more than $1,000, check Form 1040ES, Estimated Tax For Individuals and Publication 505, Tax Withholding and Estimated Tax, to determine if Estimated Taxes would apply to you. You may also need to file Form 2210, Underpayment of Estimated Tax by Individuals, Estates & Trusts, if you do not make estimated tax payments. Please contact your state for sales tax information and state filing requirements. I hope this information assists you. References; *Publication 334, Tax Guide for Small Business (For Individuals Who Use Schedule C or C-EZ) *Publication 505, Tax Withholding and Estimated Tax
*Publication 551, Basis of Assets

IRS forms and publications may be accessed on our web site at the following address: http://www.irs.gov/forms_pubs/index.html or ordered through our toll-free forms line at:
800-829-3676
Expect delivery within 10 business days.

Other useful toll-free numbers include:
800-829-1040 IRS Tax Help Line for Individuals
800-829-4933 Business and Specialty Tax Help Line
800-829-1954 Refund Hotline
**NEW** 866-562-5227 Disaster Relief Toll-Free Number, Monday
through Friday, 7 am to 10:00 pm local time

We are interested in your opinion and providing the best possible service to you. Please take a moment to answer our survey at: http://www.irs.gov/help/page/0,,id=13155,00.html
This answer is based on our understanding of the facts you presented in your question.  Omission of facts may affect the answer given.

Here’s a tip for navigating the IRS web site. Use the “search” button at the right side of the web page.  Enter key words or phrases for your topic in the entry box.  It could help you find your answer immediately.

EMPLOYEE ID: 25-04346      Mrs. Rockwell    Tel.:(800)829-1040    msg#: 1771100

Specifically:

1. Is it in fact a typo when she writes “Include the $40 sale price of this jacket with your gross income…”?  Did she mean $20?
2. Didn’t I determine the Fair Market Value (FMV) by posting the item for auction?  Isn’t the FMV then exactly the sale price plus the shipping charge?  Since postage is an expense for me, am I actually marking a loss on this sale?
3. Everything non-perishable is collectible (The Onion had a funny bit on this, but it’s true.)  How does/would being “collectible” change the answer?  Who makes this decision?

Alternative auctions

Sun, 17 Feb 2008 22:42:08 -0600

OK, first I’ve heard of it, and it starts in a little over an hour.

Sellers — apparently many sellers (including PowerSellers) — are going to be boycotting eBay due to huge rate hikes and questionable changes to the feedback system.  The rate hikes could be as much as 67%, according to analysis I have read.

Power Sellers Unite is a site with much detail about the eBay boycott.

It looks like the most tenable competitor right now is iOffer.  They seem grassroots, kind of craigslist-meets-eBay, and have nifty tools to transfer your feedback and items.  I haven’t gone through the steps yet.

Anyone else involved?  Anyone boycotting, or not boycotting?  Any other suggestions of sites on which to list?  Any idea of what to do with the listings I currently have running?  Discuss!

The Euro. Egads.

Sun, 25 Nov 2007 23:18:45 -0600

Unregulated foreign currency exchange scares the daylight out of me.  But anyone else in the US tempted to buy a truckload of Euros (FXCM’s software may be malware, I don’t know), even at the buck-and-a-half they’re going for now?  They keep going up, and I’m guessing they’ll top $2 before Bush is out of office.

The right move at this point for Gatherers’ Guild, the M:tG site I’m a partner in, seems to be to slice shipping costs to Europe to the bare minimum and buy Euro-targeted ads to start sending all our cards overseas.  If $60 in cards can cost them only 40 Euros (which was about $39 a few years ago), you bet they’ll be happy.

Audi costs

Wed, 14 Apr 2004 19:50:38 -0500

I’m hoping to get some financial advance from my readers.  Here is the situation:

I am financing a 2000 A6 sedan. I really like the car. But I’ve just been saddled with a $2,000 repair. I’ve already authorized it, so

that’s unavoidable.  This brings the total maintenance cost thus far to around $5,000 over two years.

With my financing arrangement, the total amount of money I will pay for the car is around $28,000. I have approximately $17,000 left to pay
off the loan.  When I bought the car, it had 55,000 miles on it and was in excellent condition.  The KBB

value was around $30,000, so I got a pretty good deal on the car at that time.

Now, two years later, I have put 55,000 more miles on it for a total of 110,000 miles.  Its current KBB value, if it still had just

55,000 miles on it, would, interestingly, be $17,000, the amount I have left on my loan.  My payments would have just kept the principal

in line with depreciation.  I would essentially have been paying $464 per month to lease the car: I have pumped $9,000 into it, but

would not have seen my equity increase at all. However, since it has twice that milage, it is now worth just $13,000. This has left me in the

rather odd situation of having to come up with $4,000 cash for the privilege of selling my car.

To do a little math, the maintenance costs (and that includes everything, including oil changes, scheduled maintenance, and tires) work out

to about $0.10 per mile. With a car that gets approximately 25 m.p.g., this means that I’m adding $2.50 per gallon of gas to the operating

expense of the car.  Since the car only

takes 91 octane and higher, and since I live in Southern California, what I have essentially done is, thus far, double the price of

gasoline, compared with the hypothetical car that requires no work whatsoever. Following this logic, my maintenance costs on the car are equal to the costs to operate the car without maintenance with gas at $5.00 per gallon, or

about what they pay in Europe.

So the question is, Is it worth it? The $5000 in repairs includes the pricey 100,000 mile scheduled maintenance (which might be a scam, I don’t know), and with the amount of driving I am

currently performing, that won’t have to be performed again for another two and a half years. But as it’s unlikely for the maintenance cost

of an older car to be lower than when it was newer, I can pretty much expect at least this same expenditure.  More, actually, because

while 55,000 over the span of time I’ve owned the car works out to around 530 miles per week, I’m currently putting closer to 700 per week

on the car. That, conveniently but dishearteningly, works out to around $200 per month: about the amount I pay for gas, as mentioned above, and almost half what I pay to service my loan.

Thing is, despite owing $4,000 more on the car than its current value, depreciation has probably stabilized somewhat. To wit, in three more

years, it won’t have lost another $25,500, the linearly projected rate at which it has depreciated thus far.  That would give it a value of -$12,500,

which is absurd. Even if the car’s not running, it will be worth more than that. And the only way a good car like the 2000 A6 would not be

running three years from now is a catastrophic accident — and that I’m insured for.  So in three years the car will be worth, what?

That’s one of the questions. Projecting my future mileage over three years gives me a total of 220,000 miles. A 1997 A6 (that’s the year

2000 minus three years: follow?) with 220,000 miles books at $7,280. Now figuring in inflation and the fact that the 2000 A6 is a better

car to begin with, could we project a value in three years of $9,000?  $10,000?  Let’s pick $9,000.

Another wrinkle is that even though my payments will have the same absolute dollar price over the next five years, in an inflationary market

the dollar is constantly losing value, so the relative cost of my car payments is going down (this is part of the effect that gives

your grandmother $300 per month house payments while her neighbors pay $2,000.) I’m unsure if I’ve compensated for this effect fully by

increasing the projected resale value of my car in three years to $9,000.  Can you tell I’ve never taken an accounting course?

Thus, my current situation is $4,000 negative equity in my car.  Projecting future trends as best I can, I will pay $7,500 (that

number is subject to radical change) for service and $17,000 (that number is fixed) in car payments over the next three years while the car

loses another $4,000 in value. But then the car will be paid off, and I’ll own something worth $9,000. So, drum roll please, the car will

cost me $24,500 over the next three years, but then I’ll have a positive equity of $9,000, which seems like a net expenditure of $15,500

over the next three years, or an annual operating budget of $5,000.

But there are many questions in my mind. Perhaps most significantly, I’ve rather haphazardly included inflation in my calculations wherever

the whim struck me. How do my calculations need to be refined to figure that in? Also very significantly, how valid is my projection of

future repair costs? Every part in a car would seem to have a certain lifespan, so as the car gets older my intuition suggests that the

repair costs will go up and up (for instance, if a part lasts 150,000 or 200,000 miles, I haven’t had to replace it yet, but I will in the

future, whereas if it goes out every 30,000 miles, I’ve already had to replace it and I will

continue to have to replace it on a regular basis.)  A lot of this is just experience.  I don’t have a lot of experience repairing

cars. I’ve owned cars for eight years now, but I used to buy junkers for $1,200 and just drive them until they died. So, what’s the model

of the curve of a car’s repair costs, f(x), as it ages?  Intuition suggests that f(x) > x, but does f(x) = x2?  ex?  OK,

just forget that: how much more will the cost of my car go up to maintain?  Anyone?

In a sense I’ve already answered my own question. From year 0 (when I started owning cars) until year 6 (when I got the Audi), I’ve owned

[counts in head — Buick that doesn’t count because of the insurance payout after it got wrecked, Chrysler, Honda, Toyota, Buick — maybe

the Toyota shouldn’t completely count as it’s still running] 4 cars. As they were each about $1,200, and lasted one and a half years

apiece, and since I would buy a new car any time I was faced with a repair bill of $700 or higher — OK, that’s actually not enough

information yet, but let’s say I paid $800 total for maintenance for each of the cars — that’s $2,000 over a year and a half, or about

$1,300 per year annual operating cost. All of that’s loss, by the way, because in all but one of the cases I donated the car to a charity

after I was done with it, and since I didn’t (and don’t) itemize my deductions all I got was a warm fuzzy feeling. But that’s terribly

facile: there are other, major factors that increase the worth of the Audi.  Safety, for one.  Reliability, because each of the

junkers would leave me stranded at the side of the road far too frequently, and that’s just a lot less attractive with a small child.

Third, comfort. I’d lose the “cool” factor in my own estimation: Audis are my favorite cars. And I’d like to say the prestige doesn’t matter to me,

but it’s worth a certain amount to not have valets snub you, not get as many stares and honks, and not have Thousand Oaks’ completely

corrupt police force pull you over because you’re driving an older model car and obviously don’t belong there (Yeah, they do that. They’ll

make up a problem, like saying your tail-light is broken when it isn’t, then tell you charming things like the fact that they almost pulled

their gun on you. And they’ll ask you repeatedly if you have guns or drugs in the car, because they’re “sure” they saw you “stash”

something.  Foreign readers take this to heart.  American police in affluent areas really are this corrupt, it’s not just media

hype.)

Help me fix my numbers, please, but even if I got my numbers right, I don’t think the question is just whether it’s worth a $3,700 per year

(or about $300 per month) surcharge for the benefits I enumerated above. That I’d have to answer without your help. The questions are more

“Is there a car with a lower-than-$1,200-per-year annual operating cost?” I don’t know. And “Is it worth my gathering up $4,000 cash, plus

ponying up at least $1,300 to fix a body problem that’s Audi’s own admitted fault that they refuse to compensate you for, just so I can sell

my car?” That is, “Is is it worth $5,300 now for projected savings later?” You should know that, while I’m not comfortable telling everyone what our

annual household income is now that Jenn’s staying at home, it’s lower than it was two years ago. But Jenn will go back to work before

the three years is up. And my pay will go up, and if it doesn’t outpace inflation, there will be more serious problems. And finally, Yes, I guess I

am asking you to help me make the value judgments of whether the safety cum reliability cum prestige is worth the extra

expenditure.

I’d love your help.  Link to comments page in the dateline.

NPR costs

Tue, 30 Mar 2004 20:11:52 -0600

One of my local NPR stations is having a pledge drive, as you might have inferred from a previous post. Good grief, the hosts are annoying in pleading for money. They try every trick, every guilt trip, every manipulation in existence to compel you to give money. I want them to stay on the air as much as anyone, but it gets ridiculous.

One interesting departure, however, was when they delved into the realm of fact. They cited a statistic, presumably calculated by dividing the annual operating budget by the number of minutes in a year, that it costs $18 per minute to run the station. They were proferring this as if it demonstrated the high cost of the radio station. Does it seem to anyone else that this is really cheap? $18 per minute is thirty cents per second; you can drop quarters into a coffee can with a slot cut in the top faster than that. If I can count out an amount of money, in broadcasing, with coins, in real time, I don’t think it can qualify as expensive. I’m not complaining: paying NPR, PRI, and BBC subscription costs, as well as maintaining multiple offices and many hosts and on-site reporters for so little money is admirable. I just don’t think it’s expensive.

One o’clock banking

Sun, 21 Mar 2004 00:54:47 -0600

I know it’s one o’clock in the morning, but I want to do my bills right now and both my banking site and my loan site are down for maintenance. This doesn’t happen with paper, does it?

The computer failed, so George fixed it

Mon, 12 May 2003 12:55:48 -0500

From I, Cringely: The Pulpit:

Finally, I am sorry to report this week the death of George Morrow, one of the early pioneers of personal computing.  Morrow started two computer companies of his own — Morrow’s Microstuff and Thinkertoys (later called Morrow Designs after the lawyers for TinkerToys objected) — and his computer designs were also built by Osborne Computing and Zenith Data Systems.  George was audited by the IRS, and the agent used a Z-171 computer that George designed.  The computer failed halfway through the audit, so George fixed it.

Forbes Fictional Fifteen

Wed, 25 Sep 2002 14:53:09 -0500

The Forbes Fictional Fifteen.  So who’s richer: Daddy Warbucks, Bruce Wayne, or J.R. Ewing?