{celebrating a decade of learning to write in front of an audience}

Archive for the 'complaints' Category

Tavis is gone

Thu, 16 Dec 2004 20:45:24 -0600

Well, Tavis Smiley has not renewed his contract and his show is going off NPR. I don’t know where I’ll get daily information about the reparations movement now. Or where I’ll get to hear every issue under the sun framed in terms of race, from politics and culture to diet and entertainment. Or hear people justifiably angered by discriminatory assumptions, but who in turn assume everyone listening is a conservative Christian. Or hear Tavis tailor his accent and vocabulary to match each guest’s, giving the impression that he has no real accent or vocabulary of his own. And I’ll miss the experience of feeling racist because I think he and his program are full of shit. But I think I’ll learn to cope.

TV-B-Gone

Wed, 08 Dec 2004 18:41:28 -0600

TV-B-Gone. If you are the kind of person who enjoys being self-righteously but passively aggressive. This is probably the same same set of people who think anonymous chalk graffiti is a great idea.

Paypal withdrawal limits

Mon, 08 Nov 2004 23:02:48 -0600

Daily cash withdrawal limits from your PayPal debit card are either $300 or $400, depending on your service level. You can see your limit by going to your “Account Overview” page and selecting “View Limits”. Remember this, because when I forgot and tried to withdraw $500, I ended up locked out of my account (presumably for the rest of the day, although I won’t know that for sure until tomorrow.)

Why was I trying to withdraw $500? To deposit into my checking account. I know it costs $1, rather than being free (as a bank transfer is), but I hate having my funds in limbo for four days, absent from my PayPal account but not yet in my bank account.

Mount St. Helens anthropomorphises self, with help.

Fri, 01 Oct 2004 18:59:30 -0500

Mount St. Helens clears throat with steam eruption

Mount St. Helens belched a roiling plume of gray-white steam and ash Friday, more than a week after a flurry of earthquakes warned the volcano was reawakening [emphasis added].

I think David Ammons, Associated Press Writer is trying a bit too hard.

Shut up with your whistling

Sun, 12 Sep 2004 01:28:01 -0500

In the spirit of the Olympics that just ended; and all the concert recordings I’ve been listening to recently; and the comedy shows I listen to on my way to work: I want a ban on that whistle. You know, that one. The two-fingers-in-the-mouth high-pitched summon-the-neighborhood-dogs make-everyone’s-ears-hurt one. I don’t want it to be illegal.  That wouldn’t work, and I don’t want to restrict peoples’ liberties.  I want it to be impossible.  Just impossible.  I wish no one had ever invented that thing.

Viking Insurance, redux

Wed, 30 Jun 2004 02:05:41 -0500

A follow-up to my car post of a few weeks ago. In summary, the Viking Insurance rep made an offer for settlement, and I suggested they double it. They’ve called back and have said, essentially, “O.K., we’ll double it.”

Oh, and Audi performed the repair job on my bumper, which ended up running to $2000, for free. I’ll be posting an open letter to Audi in the next week thanking them.

John Kerry complaints

Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:52:16 -0500

John Kerry: “I’m running for President to make the country we love safer, stronger, and more secure. I’m asking every American to be a Citizen Soldier…”

Oh, shut up.  Like what we need is another president who sees everything as a military conflict.

And try this: “John Kerry has the vision to create a new Manhattan Project to make America independent of Middle East oil in 10 years by creating alternative fuels like ethanol and making cars more efficient.”

Great, use the terminology of nuclear weaponry to discuss green ititiatives.

“John Ashcroft has launched an all-out assault on individual rights, allowing for a wholesale invasion of attorney-client conversations, e-mails and telephone calls. Immediately after the election, John Kerry will name a new Attorney General whose name is not John Ashcroft.  We will also fight to protect women’s rights, civil rights and workers rights and enforce anti-trust laws.”

Yeah, you know, that other stuff when we get around to it.  The important thing is just to have someone not named John Ashcroft.

“John Kerry supports expanding our nation’s hate crime law. He supports efforts to provide equal justice for all victims of hate violence, regardless of their race, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, gender or disability.”

A step-by-step analysis of the actual points, rather than the sloppy writing, on which I disagree with Kerry will have to wait until I have more time, but the author structures this paragraph as if B follows from A, which it most certainly does not. If anything they are incompatible, as “equal justice” is completely at odds with “special sentences for certain crimes”.

Pizza Hut

Thu, 24 Jun 2004 00:20:32 -0500

Pizza Hut: Helloandthankyoufuhcallingpeezahuthomeofthefourallwillthisbefordeliveryorcarryout?

Josh: Delivery.

P: Wouldyaliketohearourspecials?

J: Sure.

P: Twoonetoppingbuffalowingsnineteenninetynine.

J: What?

P: Twoonetoppingbuffalowingsnineteenninetynine.

J: One topping buffalo wings?

P: Twoonetoppingandbuffalowingsnineteenninetynine.

J: Oh.

I usually order online, but they have recently “improved” their web app to the point at which it is completely unusable.

This Viewsonic sucks, but I never replaced it

Thu, 17 Jun 2004 00:44:06 -0500

This ViewSonic sucks.  I’m buying a new monitor.  A flat panel.  Today.  Or Friday.

The Brights

Tue, 15 Jun 2004 20:13:37 -0500

I was a bit skeptical, and … annoy[ed] at the possibility that the word bright would be used to imply that we are smarter than other people. Yet, reading some of the essays posted on the brights’ web site quickly changed my mind. After all, not all “gay” people are gay in the sense of being happy, easy-going fellows, right? — Massimo  Pigliucci

And I sigh.

Look, Massimo, Richard, Daniel: you’re not helping. I know you feel crapped upon — most atheists do — but we’re not going to increase tolerance and education by referring to ourselves as smarties or clevers, even if we were to contend that “by saying I’m a clever, I’m not saying I am clever.”  You cannot just hijack terms with unflattering antonyms because it makes you feel warm and fuzzy.  That just puts people on the defensive, and it’s frankly offensive.

There are two main reasons to adopt an umbrella term for people currently identifying as atheists, agnostics, freethinkers, secular humanists, and rationalists, and neither seem particularly beneficial. The more reasonable one is to promote a sense of self-identity, using a “positive” term (and I mean that both linguistically and approbationally.) I understand the draw of having a desirable term with which to self-label, but it seems clannish and petty. The second, worse reason seems to be apparent inflation of our ranks, trying to look like a larger minority, which is a bit sneaky.

Massimo Pigliucci and Daniel Dennett (they’re the less shrill ones, if you’re keep track) admitted wariness in initially embracing the term. Go with your instincts, guys.

Gold-plated money clip

Sat, 12 Jun 2004 00:51:50 -0500

You have got to be kidding me.  They really presented a gold-plated money clip to the people who filed past Reagan’s sealed casket at the Presidential Library?  Seriously.  Not a David Cross routine.  Real life.  I’m not making this up.  A gold-plated money clip.

Good to know that you didn’t have to be there to get one, though.  Follow the link above to buy one on eBay.  Greed Is Good®, right?

My workplace in Thousand Oaks closed early today, as the only route of egress was the motorcade route. We’d have been locked in a research facility with a jammed soda machine and only sputtering chambers and broadband connections to entertain us.  Sounds like an Fox sitcom premise, when you think about it.

The motorcade was scheduled for evening, but at 11:30 a.m. people were lining Lynn Road (I swear I am still not making this up) with padded folding chairs, sunglasses, tacky beach visors, and red Igloo coolers of Diet Coke. When I left, I saw more of the same, along with hordes of miniature people born during Clinton administrations I and II — and someone had thoughtfully gone through and placed red, white, and blue helium balloons around the route.  It was packed like Disneyland on the Fourth of July weekend. Northbound 101 was jammed with cars for miles; driving past I felt like Judd Hirsch in Independence Day, hauntingly feeling like I was somehow going the wrong way.  Southbound 101 was accessorized with hovering military helicopters armed with fucking missiles.  For real.  This is still real life.

Viking insurance

Wed, 09 Jun 2004 16:55:23 -0500

In November 2003 I was in a traffic accident. I had to come to a quick stop, but the two people behind me didn’t react fast enough. I was hit by the car behind me, which was in turn hit by the car behind it. I ended up in physical therapy for a month. One of the cars was insured by the relatively expensive State Farm, who have been nothing but professional through the whole process. The other was car was insured by fly-by-night “specialty insurance” provider Viking, part of the Royal & Sunalliance group, where “specialty” is a euphemism, according to their website, for “mandatory coverages for customers who are less able to afford auto insurance”. Viking has had three BBB complaints in the last 12 months, which the BBB lists as “satisfactory”.

There’s one more piece of data you need to know. A while back I ran into a fault with my Audi. There’s a design flaw in which front bumpers will get caught on parking lot obstructions and tear off (I mentioned this problem here.) Audi quoted me a price of $1300 to repair it, but shortly after I received the quote I received a letter from the lawyers pursuing a class action to get this very issue resolved, so I held out. When the accident occurred, I was missing a front bumper, but this had nothing to do with this case. I wasn’t making a claim for this damage. The insurance adjuster estimated the damage to my rear bumper at $700.

I have been in communication with adjuster Dawn, who has been out of the office for long stretches of time. I got in touch with her today, and these are the highlights of the conversation, from memory. It’s surreal.

Dawn:  We’re offering you $x.

Josh:  That’s lower than what State Farm offered.  Lower by 100%, actually.

Dawn:  But this was a minor accident.

Josh:  Well…

Dawn:  This was a minor accident, and you had previously been in another accident that damaged your front bumper.

Josh:  That wasn’t an accident, that was my bumper getting caught on a planter in a parking lot while I was backing up.

Dawn:  But it did more than $1000 damage to your car.

Josh:  Yes.

Dawn: It was obviously more serious. It did $1000 damage to your car, and you weren’t injured, but you were injured during this $700 accident? I don’t see how that could be.

Josh:  You’re not making any sense.

Dawn:  Well, that’s your opinion.

Josh: No, that’s not just my opinion. Look, if a baseball hit my car and shattered my windshield, and the windshield cost me $1000 to replace, would you consider that a more serious accident than the impact?

Dawn:  You’re comparing apples and oranges.

Josh:  Exactly.  You’re comparing apples and oranges.

Dawn:  But you did $1000 damage to your bumper.

Josh:  They’re completely different.  In one I was driving, in the other I was backing up in a parking lot.

Dawn:  But you weren’t driving when you were hit [by our insured].  You were stopped.

Josh:  The other guy sure as hell wasn’t stopped!

Dawn:  Well, he was coming to a stop, and didn’t brake fast enough.  At least that’s what you told us.  [Switches to dramatic voice:] Or is that what happened?

Josh:  No, that’s what happened.  We’ve been over this, lots of times.

Dawn:  OK, then.

[more bizarre exchange…]

Josh:  [Starting to laugh:] Look, I know full well that you may know what you’re saying is nonsense and that you’re just trying to screw with me, and that’s fine.

Dawn:  [Getting flustered:] Well, what do you want?  Let’s talk about that.

Josh:  $y [where y = 2 times x; that's the amount State Farm paid]

Dawn: Well, I don’t have your file right now, it was taken by an auditor. But call me back on Monday, and I’ll see what I can do.

Josh:  [Laughing:] OK.

Dawn:  Bye.

Josh:  [Still laughing:] Bye.

The world before Firefox

Tue, 08 Jun 2004 01:45:44 -0500

My XP box is unstable. My Linux box is slow. That gives me the choice of fast, unreliable browsing or slow, predictable browsing. I’m downloading Opera to see if that speeds things up a bit on the Linux box.

Clear Channel autostim

Thu, 27 May 2004 15:28:49 -0500

This is hardly a new sentiment, but as far as I’m concerned, Clear Channel can go fuck itself.

Kenn Starr on the Pledge

Tue, 11 May 2004 15:41:08 -0500

What do you think Kenneth Starr’s position on the constitutionality of the Pledge of Allegiance is?  Ready to be surprised?

Well, you won’t be:

As the Cold War was unfolding, Congress added the words “under God” as a more complete and decidedly relevant statement of the nation’s political philosophy. … [I]t will rightly be said that schoolchildren will doubtless feel peer pressure to participate in an exercise in which they (or their parents) emphatically disagree … [but the] answer is not to abolish the exercise itself.

The Love Song of J Alfred Crew

Thu, 22 Apr 2004 03:42:04 -0500

The Love Song of J Alfred Crew.  Note that the site goes on to explain the joke. Just a heads up, guys: The reason they’re not laughing is not that New Yorker subscribers don’t read their Eliot. It’s because the joke’s not funny.

Onion complaint

Thu, 22 Apr 2004 02:50:39 -0500

Two weeks ago, Weird Al’s parents died of accidental carbon monoxide poisoning in their home.  They had been burning a fire with the flue closed.

Today I read a “joke” article in The Onion:

Weird Al Honors Parents’ Memory With ‘Tears In Heaven’ Parody

FALLBROOK, CA?Zany, mourning entertainer “Weird Al” Yankovic has parodied Eric Clapton’s eulogy song “Tears In Heaven” in loving tribute to his parents, who recently died of carbon-monoxide poisoning in their San Diego home, a spokesman for Yankovic said Monday. “Al’s hurting deeply right now, and this is his way of honoring Nick and Mary,” Karl Tuft said of the song in which a subdued Yankovic sings, “First you lit some flames / Then the smoke stopped your breathin’ / Carbon mono’s th’way you went… / Up to heaven” over a somber, minor-key accordion melody. Tuft added that the best way for Yankovic to give voice to his pain and loss was by altering the voice of Clapton’s pain and loss.

Sometimes I’m offended by The Onion, but after a while I realize I’m being a little too uptight. But the more I think about it, the more I’m upset by this. Death of parents (Weird Al) and children (Clapton) is off limits. It’s not funny. It’s tasteless and repugnant. It’s also offensive to suggest that Weird Al, an all around nice guy, would touch “Tears in Heaven”.

Eyes Wide Shut

Sun, 18 Apr 2004 02:12:19 -0500

“Toni Collette has proven she can do about anything — but she can’t do this.”  Ebert, with whom I sometimes disagree but whom I almost always respect, pans Connie and Carla, reassuring me that I don’t have to go see this movie despite, along with 98% of Americans, having liking Vardalos’s previous effort.

Among his other new reviews, he gives Kill Bill: Vol. 2 a perfect four stars. No, I’m not going to link to it. You shouldn’t read it. I sure didn’t. It’s my most anticipated movie for this year. The only reason I haven’t seen it yet is that Jenn wants to see it and we haven’t gotten the first one from Netflix yet. (Come on, red envelope. Come on, red envelope.)

Why was I at Ebert’s site to begin with?  I wanted to see what he thought of Eyes Wide Shut, which I just saw. And his response surprised me: he seemed to pan it in his review, then gave it 3.5 stars. If this was mailed to him blind, with no identifying information, and if he was hypothetically dense enough not to recognize the director screaming “I’m KUBRICK!” through the whole thing with bizarre lighting and endless cart shots, I wonder how he would have scored this auteur piece. I think we give A-list, brilliant, directors a little too much credit when interpreting their works.

Not that I thought it was terrible. I’m trying to be really careful not to ruin anything, so I can’t really discuss the good parts in detail, but I’ll stick to the stuff everyone probably already knows about the film. The orgy scene was incredibly eerie, and had the potential to be world-class if the ham-handed digital insertion of black silhouettes to earn it the R Rating hadn’t been done. (And to digress for a moment, let me say that was completely unconscionable. In no way should someone under 17 see the film. The studio forcing the edit is pandering to our societal stigma of adult-labeled material. Our society, on a general level, wants to see adult material: sex, nudity, action, violence, but for some reason we’re only comfortable seeing it if no one reminds us that kids shouldn’t be seeing it. We’re adults, they’re kids. We’re allowed to like things that are inappropriate for them.) The costumer should have won an Oscar. I get the Homeric bit — the episodic nature of the story, the “variations on a theme” composition — but that’s been done to death. It didn’t work for me. It’s been thousands of years. Not every protagonist needs an Odyssey. But to its credit, the film did something a bit unusual for plots of this type, which was to maintain a perfectly planned plot arc via these disconnected vignettes.

I’m venturing a bit close to the material.  Sorry.  Let me try to step back.

Stepping away from the details, my main complaint with the film was the following. For all the hype of it being ground-breaking, edgy, and artsy, it was one of the most morally parochial films I’ve ever seen. (I won’t go into more detail here, but I’ll take this to email with anyone who is interested.) The juxtaposition of the filming and the philosophy is bizarre, and I think irreconcilable. Kubrick was both screenwriter and director, so it’s not a case of mismatch between two people. If Kubrick really is as parochial as the plots and the too-tidy resolution indicate, then it’s inappropriate to show the images he chose to show to his audience, even — especially — for shock value. If he really was post-traditional morality enough to believe the stuff belongs on celluloid, he should get off his puritanical high horse and admit that relationships are more complex than the pencil sketch he committed to paper and film.

Lose. Lose. Lose.

Thu, 15 Apr 2004 18:11:37 -0500

Aaargh.  Lose.  LOSE.  LOSE.  The damn word is spelled LOSE.  That word that means “misplace”, or “become deprived of”, or “fail to win”?  LOSE.  L – O – S – E.  I know it has an “oo” sound in it, but it’s not that hard to remember the exception.  Why can so few people spell this word?  It’s four little letters.

The Scam Post

Mon, 12 Apr 2004 23:32:09 -0500

This is one of the long posts I’ve been intending to write for a couple of years, along with a planned police harassment post and a medical post. But this post, the scam post, was prompted by the introduction of Snopes’ Daily Scam Report.

It is really easy to get scammed in our society. Considerate, well-raised people want to help, and want not to be thought poorly of. But thereare tons of people ready to take advantage of you at the slightest opportunity.

Disillusionment is hard, but necessary. I think more people are scammed than we think, because after a scam people tend to be embarrassed for being made a sucker. I hope to do my part here by presenting a sampling of the scams people have pulled on me, both
successfully and unsuccessfully. For the record, I’m listing the races, ages, and dress of the perpetrator, to help indicate that all sorts of people will try to scam you (and to dispel any myth that it’s mostly minorities: I’ve been hit up far more frequently by Caucasians.)

The Successful Scams

The auto body work scam (2003)

Setting: Strip mall parking lot, Rosemead Blvd and Foothill Blvd, Pasadena, California

This one is long, and for clarity I’m adding footnotes.  Check at the end of this section for the numbered list.

The 2000 Audi A6 models have a design flaw which causes front bumpers to become caught on curbs and parking lot cement blocks. There is currently a class-action lawsuit trying to get Audi to recall the cars, but it hasn’t happened yet. In 2003, after my front bumper had been mostly detached for about a year, I was stopped in a parking lot by a pair of Hispanic men in their late twenties or early thirties wearing respectable clothes driving a white van. The passenger said “I’m a body shop guy, and I can fix that bumper for you.”

“Oh, what shop?” I asked

“A-1 Auto Body in Pasadena.  But our uncle owns it and he lets us do work on the side.”

I was hesitant. He told me he could go to my workplace and do it while I worked. He could do it in a commercial parking lot if I wanted.

We could go to my house and fix it there. He told me that if I didn’t like how it turned out “I wouldn’t owe him a dime.” I told him thatthe dealership had quoted me a price of $1300 to fix it. 1  He thought for a moment and said he could do it for $900.  I told him that no, I was busy, but if he gave me his number I would call him if I changed my mind. He rattled off the number, but said that if I did it today he could do it for$700. 2  He said he’d do such a good job that at the end I’d want to give him a tip.  I was pondering this, and he asked me if I was a Christian.3  I told him that, no, I wasn’t.  “Well, I’m a Christian,” he said, “and I wouldn’t cheat you.”

I relented.  We went back to my house4 and they started working on the car.  They removed the bumper, and the very nice guys5 explained what they were going to do. I forgot all the steps, but it was something like they were going to fill in the torn fiberglass places with resin, then re-attach the bumper, then putty the joints, then seal the putty, then paint the putty (”I think your paint color is such-and-such,” he said.  “There are just a few stock colors that cars come off the line with.6  We have that car paint in our van.”), then apply a coat of wax.  Sounded reasonable to me.

It took them a couple of hours, and then they applied a liberal coating of mostly opaque white wax. As this was going on, my mom called and mentioned that she had been in a small accident and would need some body work done. I told her about the guys and asked them if they could handle repairing the bumper on a Ford Escort. They told me that they could, for $300. My mom stopped by and they pounded out the back of her car where it had been hit, allowing the hatchback to close again. The rear bumper was ruined, but they said they worked with a guy who ran a wrecking yard. They would bring by a bumper for the Escort after I gave them the money. There were also a couple minor pieces of the Audibody that they said they could get for me.

I wasn’t that stupid, I thought.  (Yeah, I thought.) I told them if they came by the next day I’d go with them to get the car bumper from their friend, then they could come back and finish fixing the Escort. I wouldn’t pay them for that until the job was done. But they wanted payment for the Audi now.

But then we remembered it was a holiday Friday. The banks were closed. I offered to write a check. They knew where I lived, so I thought it would be a safe proposition for them (they could come back if it didn’t clear), but no, they wanted cash. So I told them to come back the next day, and I’d get the money.

That night I started getting suspicious. I doubted that the guys would follow through with getting the parts for me. I was also suspiciousabout the opaque coat of wax that was covering the bumper, that they had told me to leave on “for 24 hours.”

The next morning I woke up and soaked a rag in soapy water and began to remove the car wax. It didn’t look that bad, but the paint was obviously not the same color, and certainly not the same gloss. The guys showed up, and I got into their van to go to the body shop with them.7 As we drove away, the driver explained to me, “Joshua, if I take you to the auto shop, I’m going to lose my job.” He had a somewhat flimsy-sounding excuse that I saw right through, but it was now two against one in someone else’s car. They certainly had the upper hand, and I was a intimidated. I was talked into giving them a tip, “like we had talked about,” even though we hadn’t, it was just something he had brought up the day before. I went in and withdrew $740 from my account and $300 from my mother’s account, for which she had given me her ATM card. I gave them the $740 — that’s $700 for this job, plus a “tip”. We went back to the house, and he showed me where the bumper would attach on the Escort, and how easy it was. Their friend from the scrapyard would come by and could put the bumper on in about 5 minutes.8  He would come by later that day.  After a bit of cajoling, I ended up parting with the $300 as well.9

After they left, I started to get the feeling of a pit in the middle of my stomach.  I just knew I’d been conned.  Reluctantly, sheepishly, I called the number he had given me. No such number. I called telephone information and asked for a listing for A-1 Auto Body in Pasadena. No such place. Shit.

I even waited home for the rest of the day, in case the guys from the body shop came by.  But of course they didn’t.

Follow-up: Their repaired bumper popped back off the next week. I never saw the guys again. My mom had to have work done on the Escort to fix the “repair” the guys did. And since then four more guys have approached me in parking lots offering to fix my bumper. To the last one I just sighed and said “Your the fifth fucking guy who’s asked me, dude, giveit a rest.”

The loss: $740 (me), $300 (my mom), several workday hours, and the entirety of a Saturday.

  1. Stupid.  Why the hell did I tell them how much they quoted.  I think these guys would have done it for $50.
  2. Common: the hard, immediate sell.
  3. Also common.  Watch for people who try to con you based on your religious or political beliefs.
  4. Stupid, stupid.  Don’t tell scammers where you live.
  5. Yeah, they’re nice.  Scammers won’t make any money if they’re not nice.
  6. I have no idea if this is true or not, but it sounds really unlikely.
  7. Stupid, stupid, stupid!  Getting into their car?  What’s wrong with me?
  8. Again, unlikely, in retrospect, but they couldn’t have scammed me if I knew more about cars, could they?
  9. Aargh.  Stupid-to-the-fourth power.  How did they get the $300 from me?

The “I’m a little short for the bus” scam (2003)

Setting: Old Town Pasadena, California, an alley between shops.

A simple, quick one. A guy stops me and says, “I’m a little short for the bus, could you spare a quarter?” Of course it’s a scam, but oh well. I hand him a quarter. “In fact, I’m short by fifty cents, so if you have another one that would be great.” Sigh. I hand himanother quarter and walk off.

The loss: $0.50 and a bit of self respect.

The “You’re approved for a credit card!” scam (1998)

The setting: Thousand Oaks, California

This one is common. I was in my first apartment, my senior year of college. I was desperately short on funds, as I was only working half-time. I received an enticement for a free credit card with perhaps a $39.95 sign-up fee. Did I mention that would have been my first credit card, too? I signed up and sent in a check, expecting my Visa or Mastercard. Instead, I get an “in-house” credit card from a catalogue-based sellerhawking its own overpriced items by mail-order.  I call customer service, livid.  They send me a refund check.

The loss: $0, thankfully, but it could have been $39.95.  At least they were honest crooks.

The “Free access, just use your credit card to verify your age” scam (1999)

Setting: Global

I wanted to visit an access-controlled website. “Just enter your card number, we won’t charge you, it’s just to verify your age.” So I entered my bank check card number, and got access to the site, which sucked. And sure enough, I got charged, I believe $19.95. I called my bank and complained, and they gave a provisional credit. They sent a form to fill out for credit card fraud, which needed to be notarized.

I paid $15 for a notary fee and $0.33 for a stamp, and mailed it in to recoup my $19.95, which netted me $4.62 of my own money back for an hour of my time.

The loss: $15.33 plus an hour of time, valued at that time at around $22.

The Unsuccessful Scams

The “I’ll give you my eyeglasses for collateral!” scam (1995)

Setting: Santa Anita Mall, Arcadia, California

This one is absolutely priceless. I was at the Santa Anita mall in Arcadia, and I was in my late teens. There was a stocky black man (This will become important in a moment. I’m white. This will also become important in a moment.) in strong Clark Kent glasses outside B. Dalton Books. He asked me if I could help him with bus fare. “Sure,” I said. “OK, I need $48 to take Greyhound back to Northern California.

I’ll mail it back to you when I get there,” he said. I balked. “I thought you meant $2.25 for local bus fare,” I croaked. “I’m not goingto give you $48.”  It was a moot point.  I didn’t  have $48.  I didn’t even have an ATM card.  But he launched into this very well-rehearsed sob story.

The gist of it, as I remember through the haze of almost a decade, was this. He worked for a company that worked with racetracks. He had come down with his boss to the Santa Anita racetrack to help organize something, with his boss. His boss, an asshole of some garden variety, was called back home, and he left the victim to straighten things out. But he had left him stranded, and if he didn’t show up onwork on Monday, he’d be fired.

“Now, you’re probably thinking I’m a criminal because I’m black,” he said.  “But I’m not.  I’ll give you my eyeglasses as collateral!” It was at that moment I realized that his absurd eyeglasses must have been from a Salvation Army or a ShareOld Spectacles program.

“No, I’m sorry, but good luck,” I said.

“Well then, can I have the $2.25?”

“No!”

The follow-up: My friend told me he had been approached as well. I saw the same guy two more times in front of that same store, wearing a different pair of absurd eyeglasses each time. I guess some heartless bastard took the poor guy’s eyeglasses for collateral. The third andlast time I found a security guard and told them what he was doing.

The tow truck scam (1997)

The setting: Movie theater parking lot, Santa Monica, California

This is a really common one, I’m told.  A well-dressed white woman in her mid-thirties, appearing to be upper-middle-class, approached me and told me her friend’s car had brokendown.  They didn’t have AAA and they needed a tow, and she was looking for $20.

“Where’s the car?”

“Around the corner.”

“Can I see it?”

“It’s down a ways.”

“I’m sorry, I don’t have $20.”  It was a lie, but she was lying too, so fuck her.

“But you just came out of a movie theater!”

“Yeah, I used a credit card.”  Another lie.  But fuck her again.

“Well, could you go by an ATM?”

What the fuck?  If there’s an ATM, why doesn’t she use it?

“No,” I said.  “I’m leaving now.”

The “I’m a little short for the bus” scam, redux (2003)

Setting: Old Town Pasadena, California, an alley between shops.

Another simple, quick one. A guy stops me and says, “I’m a little short for the bus, could you spare a quarter?” Sound familiar? Yeah, same guy, the very next weekend.

“Oh, that’s really unlucky, ” I said.  “Two weeks in a row, huh?”

He broke eye contact with me and walked away.  Heaven help him if he tries again.  I have the perfect esprit de l’escalier planned.  It will entail being a bit of an asshole, but I’m looking forward to it.

The “save the whales” scam

Location: Faneuil Hall, Boston, Massachusetts (1997)

This was on my first pilgrimage to Concord. I was outside Faneuil Hall and was approached by a white man in his forties with a big bushy beard. He carried a clipboard, the top sheet of which had some cut-out whale pictures photocopied into a collage on it. He asked ifI would sign a petition to help protect whales and other sea mammals on the coast of New England.

“I’m not a registered voter in Massachusetts,” I told him.  He told me it didn’t matter, this was a public action campaign.

OK.  I signed his form.  Then he asked for a donation.

I laughed.  “I’m not going to give you money,” I said.

“But I thought you wanted to help the whales!” he said.

“Look, I don’t know you.  I don’t know anything about you.”

“What, you think I’m ripping you off?”

I walked away.

“Well, thanks for being an asshole!” he called after me.

So I found a security guard. “There’s a guy over there soliciting and using profanity,” I said, and described him. They hurried over.

The food scams

These are maybe the saddest. People are apparently hungry. You want to help, you really do. But in the end, it’s a dirty, thankless business.

The Mikey scam (1996)

Setting: Pasadena, California, on a hot summer day.

There is a local character (for the record, he’s white) named Mikey who always stands on the same street corner asking for change. He has cerebral palsy and is mentally retarded, and seems like a nice but down-on-his-luck guy. He also smokes, but that’s another story.

One day I was driving by and felt sorry for the guy. But I didn’t want him spending the money on booze or cigarettes. So I went across thestreet to Burger King, where they were having a 99 cent Whopper promotion and bought him one.

“Yo, Mikey,” I said, driving back.  “I got you a sandwich!”

He grinned widely.

“A Whopper?”

“Yep,” I said.

“Great!  Hey, you have any change?”

Sigh.  “Yes, Mikey,” I said, “I’ve got some change.”  I handed him about a dollar.

What’s that they say?  In for a penny, in for a pound?

The loss: About a dollar.

The “piece of cake” scam (1997)

The setting: Vons parking lot, Thousand Oaks, California

A poorly-dressed, hungry-looking white woman in her late fifties or early sixties approached me as I left the grocery store, looking fortaxi fare to Newbury Park (the adjoining city).  It was late.  She looked tired.  She looked hungry.  She looked devoid of life.

“Look,” I said, “I’m not going to give you any money, but I’ll buy you dinner if you want.”

She agreed.

We went to the deli area of the supermarket and she picked out a “po’ boy” sandwich. The we went to the dairy case and she picked out a pint of milk. I turnedto walk her to the checkout line.

“Wait,” she said.  “I’m going to go get a piece of cake.”

WHAT THE FUCK?  I’m going to go get a piece of CAKE?  Aargh!  If you are a heartless bastard like me, or are rapidly becoming one, tattoo that motherfucker to the inside of your eyelids, then any time you’re approached for money, just blink. I was pissed.

“No, you most certainly are not,” I said.  “Now do you want the food or not?”

She started pouting, but followed as I marched up to the checkout line. I took out $5 and set it on the counter as I walked by. Thecashier didn’t understand.

I jerked my thumb back.  “It’s for her food.”

“Oh, that’s really nice of you!” she said.

I smiled thinly.  “Yeah, thanks.”  I walked off.

The loss: $5, and my remaining faith in humanity.

The Church’s Chicken dude (2004)

I was taking my father to a concert in Inglewood, California. Within three quarters of a mile — this sounds like a bad racist joke, but I swear I’mnot making it up — there were  five fried chicken restaurants.  One of them was Church’s.  I like Church’s, so my father and I stopped there. On my way in I was asked by a fifty-or-so-year-old black man for change so he could “buy a piece of chicken.”. I told him no. We ordered more chicken than we could eat,though, so on the way out I asked if he was hungry.

“Yeah,” he said.

“You can have this chicken if you’re hungry,” I said.

“OK.  Hey, you got any change.”

“No.  But if you’re hungry, you can have this chicken.”

“OK.”

As we drove off, the box was sitting beside him unopened. In my father’s words, “I guess he’s looking for a beer to go with it.”

I hope he ate it.  I’d have eaten it the next day myself if he didn’t want it.

Gender Genie

Thu, 25 Mar 2004 19:11:09 -0600

I found a site called Gender Genie, that “uses a simplified version of an algorithm developed by Moshe Koppel, Bar-Ilan University in Israel, and Shlomo Argamon, Illinois Institute of Technology, to predict the gender of an author.” So I decided to do a controlled experiment. Taking publicly-available blog entries, it predicted that I am male, my brother is male, my brother-in-law is male, and Bob Mike is male.  Not bad, I thought.  So I tried the other set.  And the genie predicted that my wife is male, my sister-in-law is male, my brother-in-law’s girlfriend is male, and Bob Mike’s girlfriend Chelsea is male.  Not a bad algorithm, methinks, as long as you only feed it texts written by males.

Interesting thing is, I am nearly certain I could identify the sexes of each of these people by even a small sample of his or her writing. This implies that I’m doing something semantic (likely), some more sophisticated syntactic analysis (less likely), or both (oddly, I guess this is likely.)

One o’clock banking

Sun, 21 Mar 2004 00:54:47 -0600

I know it’s one o’clock in the morning, but I want to do my bills right now and both my banking site and my loan site are down for maintenance. This doesn’t happen with paper, does it?

TV update

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 23:44:35 -0600

Following the TV recommendations from a few days ago, it turns out that Mythbusters was a repeat and Crossing Jordan is still as crappy (sorry) as it used to be, except now it seems to be missing perhaps its best actor, Ken Howard (how this will affect the “mythology” episodes about Jordan’s mom is unclear.)  At least it’s on twice a week now, though (Sundays and Fridays), so you can at least see more of it.   And it still, of course, has Jill Hennessy, the reason I watch the show, as I mentioned on the discussion page.  As much as I want her to be, however, she’s still not a very good actress.  Not Elisabeth Röhm-bad, mind you, but not very good.

Alias was good, though.  If I felt guilty about my pleasures, this would be near the top of the list.  By almost every metric I should hate this show.  My brother and I have talked about this.  “It should suck,” as he says, “but it just doesn’t.”  I will complain about the horrible, embarassing, complete sell-out product placement in the episode, however.  They’ve always had a sweetheart deal with Nokia, it seems, and I’m fine with that: the copyrighted “Nokia tune” plays every time Sydney’s phone rings.  But this time was an order of magnitude worse.  The agents were pursuing villains through a parking garage.  The latter jumped in a Mustang to speed off, and our heroes have to nick a car to follow.  They have a split second to decide, and Sydney hollers (yes, hollers) “the F150!”  Not “that one!”, not “the truck!”, not even “the Ford!”, but “the F150!”  Then they cut to a close-up shot of the logo on the vehicle’s side and hold that for a bit.  The heroes begin to drive (no indication of whether the keys were in the car or whether they hot-wired it in approximately 0.3 seconds) but, Oh No!, the truck is boxed in.  That’s fine, “the F150″ pushes the other cars out of the way, then races down the helix of the parking garage, cornering at speed, and generally looking like a car commercial.  When the villains get away (not due to a failure of “the F150″, but because they tried to go out an entrance and were gracious enough not to want to push the innocent occupants of the other car into traffic), we cut to commercial.  There is a still graphic on the screen and a voiceover says, as if we hadn’t gathered, “Alias is brought to you by the new F150.”  And then — wait for it — there’s a commercial for “the F150″.  Presumably this technique is used to combat TiVo users, and presumably we will see this more and more of this as time goes by, but let me state for the record that this sucks.

Not Crossing Jordan-sucks, mind you, but it sucks.

St. Johns

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 20:26:49 -0600

The mcgees.org AutoPost Generator has composed the following:

“Blah blah blah, complaint, complaint, cynical observation about hypocrisy, baiting of Bob Mike into a defense of his religion, supercilious attempt at cleverness, blah blah blah.”

We now return you to your regularly scheduled blog.

Email spoofed as me

Tue, 09 Mar 2004 17:21:24 -0600


From staff@mcgees.org Tue Mar 9 00:26:32 2004

X-Apparently-To: (redacted) via 66.218.93.24; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 07:55:17 -0800

X-YahooFilteredBulk: 64.30.211.193

Return-Path: <joshua@mcgees.org>

Received: from 64.30.211.193 (EHLO mcgees.org) (64.30.211.193) by mta122.mail.dcn.yahoo.com with SMTP; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 07:55:15 -0800

Received: from mcgees.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mcgees.org (8.12.5/8.11.0) with ESMTP id i29FfnMr013388 for <(redacted)>; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 07:41:50 -0800

Received: (from joshua@localhost) by mcgees.org (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id i29Ffn1W013386 for joshuamcgee@yahoo.com; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 07:41:49 -0800

Received: from vaio (c-24-13-253-224.client.comcast.net [24.13.253.224]) by mcgees.org (8.12.5/8.11.0) with SMTP id i29Fe1Ms013272 for <joshua@mcgees.org>; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 07:40:03 -0800

Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 02:26:32 -0600

Subject:  Important notify about your e-mail account.

From: staff@mcgees.org

Message-ID: <uhodpaoyyjfxwdlpvbp@mcgees.org>

MIME-Version: 1.0

Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=”——–njfnkpfuvllatwneivch”

X-SpamBouncer: 1.7 (11/06/03)

X-SBScore: 0 (Spam Threshold: 10) (Block Threshold: 5)

X-SBClass: OK

X-Folder: Default

To: “Joshua McGee, Scanned” <joshua@mcgees.org>

Content-Length: 13350

Dear user of  “mcgees.org” mailing system,

Your e-mail account will be  disabled because of improper using in next

three days,  if you are  still wishing to  use it,  please, resign your

account information.

Please,  read the attach  for further details.

For security reasons  attached  file is password protected. The

password is “28174″.

The Management,

   The  mcgees.org  team

http://mcgees.org

Attachment: Information.zip

That was nice of “The mcgees.org Management team” (that would be me) to send that to myself, wasn’t it?  And nice of my spam filter to let it through?

Idiots in the religious right

Wed, 03 Mar 2004 16:58:50 -0600

Regular readers of mcgees.org will know what high regard we (that’s a royal “we”) have for the idiots in the ranks of the religious right (the religious right is bad enough, but their idiots are especially bad.)  One of their recent crusades?  Janet Jackson’s publicity-stunt exposure at the Super Bowl.  To begin, here is one of their mighty savants.  Read on, but make sure you invest in Sic Industries first:  “Mr. Powel [sic], I don’t consider myself to be a finatic [sic], but i [sic] do fear the wrath of GOD if our country continues it’s [sic] moral decline.”  The author speculated that if we allow a bare breast to be shown at the Super Bowl, in a few years half the population will be walking around naked.  The author goes on to acknowlege that this “sounds a little extreem [sic]“, but is adamant that what happened to “Sodom and Gamora [sic]” will happen to the United States.

Another petitioner penned the disarmingly honest sentiment that “to mix sex/violence like this gives a really wrong message”.  Surely it is not what was intended, but isn’t that the basic point?  How dare Janet Jackson pervert our celebration of violence with a hint of sexuality?  Regular readers of mcgees.org will know our (that’s a royal “our”) high regard for the Super Bowl as well — no need to cover that ground again — but allow the brief quote of someone who found not at all alarming the introduction of a breast into “a ‘game’ where men are paid huge sums of money to essentially beat each other up”.

Of course, idiocy and inarticulateness is not reserved for the right — note the amusing but not terribly erudite imprecation “Nazi government daughter of an illegitimate street walking hooker from hell“, which I believe should be shortened in casual correspondence to “NGDoaISWHfH” — but the right is always more fun to make fun of.

“Employee Plus”

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 15:13:11 -0600

We got our annual “Employee Plus” neighborhood discount card at work today, a program so apparently wealthy that they have an Earthlink email address (none of this “our own domain” nonsense!)  One local coffee shop advertises itself with the following: “Since 1992 your local alternative to delicious coffee” (none of this “delicious coffee” nonsense!)  A dry cleaner proclaims, in the discount booklet, “No gimmicks!  No coupons!  No discounts!” (none of this… — well, you get the idea.)

If you get tired of the revolting coffee and the non-discounted dry cleaning, you could go to Johnny Rockets, where the gimmick is that their servers “will pour the ketchup for you!”

Enlighten-brand soups

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 17:53:40 -0600

Safeway Select’s “Enlighten” brand fat free soups seem to be copying the more expensive Health Valley soups that I have previously discussed.  Thing is, they forgot to add something.  Flavor.  To make the split pea soup even barely palatable, I have to add three packets of pepper, a packet of salt, and a teaspoon of garlic flakes.  Caveat emptor.

Half-gig in Photoshop

Sat, 21 Feb 2004 02:30:20 -0600

If you were wondering, it’s a pain in the neck to edit half-gigabyte bitmaps in Photoshop.  Every operation takes ten minutes.

Number of the Beast is not serious

Mon, 16 Feb 2004 18:31:30 -0600

J. David Humphrey, a man who has apparently had his humor gland surgically removed, found my Number of the Beast program page and pointed me towards his Revelation Study.  For only $29.95 he’ll tell me the name of the person he has discovered to be the true antichrist.

If you’ve already paid, perhaps you would be interested in a reminder of my September Rip-Off Revenge post.  Maybe you’ll get a newer car worth $9000 more out of the deal.