<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amazon/UPS Deal</title>
	<link>http://www.mcgees.org/2008/02/25/amazonups-deal/</link>
	<description>Website of Joshua McGee</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 06:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave (Site Brother)</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgees.org/2008/02/25/amazonups-deal/#comment-45600</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave (Site Brother)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mcgees.org/2008/02/25/amazonups-deal/#comment-45600</guid>
		<description>Don't you mean "I think it &lt;b&gt;are&lt;/b&gt; an error"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you mean &#8220;I think it <b>are</b> an error&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua <i>(Site Owner)</i></title>
		<link>http://www.mcgees.org/2008/02/25/amazonups-deal/#comment-45595</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua <i>(Site Owner)</i></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 05:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mcgees.org/2008/02/25/amazonups-deal/#comment-45595</guid>
		<description>Right.  That's what I figured he would say, too.  You're basing it on whether the nouns themselves are plural, not whether they are collective nouns.  And while that's normal, in the same way that saying "I know where he's at" is normal, I think it's an &lt;i&gt;error&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right.&nbsp; That&#8217;s what I figured he would say, too.&nbsp; You&#8217;re basing it on whether the nouns themselves are plural, not whether they are collective nouns.&nbsp; And while that&#8217;s normal, in the same way that saying &#8220;I know where he&#8217;s at&#8221; is normal, I think it&#8217;s an <i>error</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moog</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgees.org/2008/02/25/amazonups-deal/#comment-45594</link>
		<dc:creator>Moog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 05:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mcgees.org/2008/02/25/amazonups-deal/#comment-45594</guid>
		<description>I don't know how Dave would "handle" them, but I would say
“The Strokes have a new album”
“Hootie and the Blowfish have a new album”
“The Los Angeles Philharmonic Orchestra has a new album”
“Pearl Jam has a new album”


The justification is that, in my world, Pearl Jam and LA Phil are each one thing, a set, and the other names refer to the elements of their respective sets. So I'd say, "The group, The Strokes, HAS a new album," since group is one, a singular collective noun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know how Dave would &#8220;handle&#8221; them, but I would say<br />
“The Strokes have a new album”<br />
“Hootie and the Blowfish have a new album”<br />
“The Los Angeles Philharmonic Orchestra has a new album”<br />
“Pearl Jam has a new album”</p>
<p>The justification is that, in my world, Pearl Jam and LA Phil are each one thing, a set, and the other names refer to the elements of their respective sets. So I&#8217;d say, &#8220;The group, The Strokes, HAS a new album,&#8221; since group is one, a singular collective noun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua <i>(Site Owner)</i></title>
		<link>http://www.mcgees.org/2008/02/25/amazonups-deal/#comment-45574</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua <i>(Site Owner)</i></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mcgees.org/2008/02/25/amazonups-deal/#comment-45574</guid>
		<description>Isn't that the rule, though?  It's a &lt;i&gt;company&lt;/i&gt; composed of &lt;i&gt;people&lt;/i&gt;:

"The people who work at Amazon apparently have&#8230;" &#8658; "Amazon apparently have&#8230;"

This is one of those cases where I think the British are actually &lt;i&gt;completely right&lt;/i&gt; and Americans &lt;i&gt;completely wrong&lt;/i&gt;.  It freaks you out?  How would you do these?

"The Strokes &lt;b&gt;has/have&lt;/b&gt; a new album"
"Hootie and the Blowfish &lt;b&gt;has/have&lt;/b&gt; a new album"
"The Los Angeles Philharmonic Orchestra &lt;b&gt;has/have&lt;/b&gt; a new album"
"Pearl Jam &lt;b&gt;has/have&lt;/b&gt; a new album"

If you would handle these differently, what is the justification?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t that the rule, though?&nbsp; It&#8217;s a <i>company</i> composed of <i>people</i>:</p>
<p>&#8220;The people who work at Amazon apparently have&hellip;&#8221; &rArr; &#8220;Amazon apparently have&hellip;&#8221;</p>
<p>This is one of those cases where I think the British are actually <i>completely right</i> and Americans <i>completely wrong</i>.&nbsp; It freaks you out?&nbsp; How would you do these?</p>
<p>&#8220;The Strokes <b>has/have</b> a new album&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Hootie and the Blowfish <b>has/have</b> a new album&#8221;<br />
&#8220;The Los Angeles Philharmonic Orchestra <b>has/have</b> a new album&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Pearl Jam <b>has/have</b> a new album&#8221;</p>
<p>If you would handle these differently, what is the justification?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave (Site Brother)</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgees.org/2008/02/25/amazonups-deal/#comment-45573</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave (Site Brother)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mcgees.org/2008/02/25/amazonups-deal/#comment-45573</guid>
		<description>"Amazon apparently have..."
"How much are Amazon..."

Stop it! STOP IT! It's freaking me out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Amazon apparently have&#8230;&#8221;<br />
&#8220;How much are Amazon&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Stop it! STOP IT! It&#8217;s freaking me out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mall shopping</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgees.org/2008/02/25/amazonups-deal/#comment-45615</link>
		<dc:creator>mall shopping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mcgees.org/2008/02/25/amazonups-deal/#comment-45615</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;, who has just started selling the iPod touch 32GB model, is very much interested in your business. So much so, that they are offering customers a free 1GB iPod shuffle with the purchase of an iPod touch 32GB. ...    MacUser - http://www.macuser.com/Amazon/UPS DealBy Joshua   OK, so, Amazon, yeah? As discussed previously, Amazon apparently have some sweetheart (but non-exclusive) deal with UPS. I verified this with the franchise owner of “my” UPS Store, who seems to know what he&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="technorati-balloon" href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?url="><img src="http://static.technorati.com/images/bubble_h17.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="links from Technorati" style="border:0;" /></a>, who has just started selling the iPod touch 32GB model, is very much interested in your business. So much so, that they are offering customers a free 1GB iPod shuffle with the purchase of an iPod touch 32GB. &#8230;&nbsp; &nbsp; MacUser - <a href="http://www.macuser.com/Amazon/UPS" rel="nofollow">http://www.macuser.com/Amazon/UPS</a> DealBy Joshua&nbsp;  OK, so, Amazon, yeah? As discussed previously, Amazon apparently have some sweetheart (but non-exclusive) deal with UPS. I verified this with the franchise owner of “my” UPS Store, who seems to know what he</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
