<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wind power deconstruction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mcgees.org/2008/02/19/wind-power-deconstruction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mcgees.org/2008/02/19/wind-power-deconstruction/</link>
	<description>Website of Joshua McGee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:17:44 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Nelson: Does wind power have exactly zero climate impact?</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgees.org/2008/02/19/wind-power-deconstruction/comment-page-1/#comment-45498</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Nelson: Does wind power have exactly zero climate impact?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcgees.org/2008/02/19/wind-power-deconstruction/#comment-45498</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Here.To the people essentially arguing that we should have a &quot;zero tolerance&quot; policy for any climatic effects (no matter how small) of carbon dioxide: How do we know that massively-deployed wind power would have absolutely no effect on climate?      Posted by Tom   at 11:44 AM [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Here.To the people essentially arguing that we should have a &#8220;zero tolerance&#8221; policy for any climatic effects (no matter how small) of carbon dioxide: How do we know that massively-deployed wind power would have absolutely no effect on climate?&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Posted by Tom&nbsp;  at 11:44 AM [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua <i>(Site Owner)</i></title>
		<link>http://www.mcgees.org/2008/02/19/wind-power-deconstruction/comment-page-1/#comment-45442</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua <i>(Site Owner)</i></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcgees.org/2008/02/19/wind-power-deconstruction/#comment-45442</guid>
		<description>Follow Dave&#039;s pictures, they are quite funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Follow Dave&#8217;s pictures, they are quite funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave (Site Brother)</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgees.org/2008/02/19/wind-power-deconstruction/comment-page-1/#comment-45441</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave (Site Brother)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcgees.org/2008/02/19/wind-power-deconstruction/#comment-45441</guid>
		<description>1. &quot;...anyone know of estimates of how many wind turbines it would take to cause significant climate change?&quot; 

I&#039;m not sure, but I found these images instructive:

Here&#039;s Palm Springs &lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/ywoza6&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;today&lt;/a&gt;.
And here it is &lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/2bp6fx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;during the Ford administration&lt;/a&gt;.

The truth seems clear.

2. &quot;something-that-means-transport-that-starts-with-P.&quot;

Ptransport. The P is silent. The first one anyway.

3. I am not creeped out by you referring to Greenpeace with plural verbs.

That is all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. &#8220;&#8230;anyone know of estimates of how many wind turbines it would take to cause significant climate change?&#8221; </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure, but I found these images instructive:</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s Palm Springs <a href="http://tinyurl.com/ywoza6" rel="nofollow">today</a>.<br />
And here it is <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2bp6fx" rel="nofollow">during the Ford administration</a>.</p>
<p>The truth seems clear.</p>
<p>2. &#8220;something-that-means-transport-that-starts-with-P.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ptransport. The P is silent. The first one anyway.</p>
<p>3. I am not creeped out by you referring to Greenpeace with plural verbs.</p>
<p>That is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
