Wikipedia Simple English

Does anyone else think the “Simple English” Wikipedia page is much harder to understand than the standard page?  Not to mention just plain wrong in parts?  Try to parse “The rule of all the Wikipedias, including this one, is that everything that is put onto the Wikipedias cannot be under copyright.”  Does that mean that some of the items put into a Wikipedia can be copyrighted?  Or how about “This is a difference license to GFDL”: exactly what language is that supposed to be?  British Substandard, I think it’s called.  Or try understanding “The changes you make are more than just making the words correct, so copyright is not kept” on the first pass.  Sure, the “simple” version doesn’t use Latinate words such as “requirement”, “permission”, and “obligation”, but reducing something to clunky Anglo-Saxon doesn’t make it easy to understand, it just makes it clunky.

I’ve added a note to the page.  Visit the “Talk about this page” link to make your own comments.

Your ad here for US$1/month.  Find out how.


Leave a Reply, but read first

  1. Feel free to leave replies even to very old posts.
  2. You have pretty much free rein to write whatever you like.  Just make it contentful and it will probably stay, even if you are abusing me.  Just:
  3. Don't bother spamming.  Your links are automatically tagged "nofollow".  You won't increase your Google rating.  Nobody will click them anyway.  Save us both some time.
  4. Advertising Policy: The URL field is for personal blogs, not commercial enterprises.  Have a valid website or product to advertise?  Those do get clicked, and it's cheap.  Click here to advertise.  Otherwise, your URL is subject to deletion at editor's discretion.