<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gelernter</title>
	<link>http://www.mcgees.org/2001/01/09/gelernter/</link>
	<description>Website of Joshua McGee</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 05:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mcgees.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Blank Slate</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgees.org/2001/01/09/gelernter/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>mcgees.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Blank Slate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 21:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mcgees.org/2001/01/09/gelernter/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>[...] Now, hold on.&#160; That is an immeasurably lousy definition of disease and disorder, on the scale of David Gelernter&#8217;s definition of vivid imagination.&#160; By this definition, brain death is not a disorder.&#160; Early-stage HIV infection is not a disease.&#160; They&#8217;re not causing suffering, right?&#160; At least not unless you expand suffering to something like &#8220;eventual diminution of lifespan&#8221;, or &#8220;elimination of the potential for experience of happiness&#8221;. But maybe his argument doesn&#8217;t rely on the suffering bit, or maybe it permits this sort of wide definition. He proceeds to explain why violence is not a disorder: But as a writer for Science recently pointed out, &#8220;Unlike most diseases, it&#8217;s usually not the perpetrator who defines aggression as a problem; it&#8217;s the environment. Violent people may feel they are functioning normally, and some may even enjoy their occasional outbursts and resist treatment.&#160; (Emphasis added) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Now, hold on.&nbsp; That is an immeasurably lousy definition of disease and disorder, on the scale of David Gelernter&#8217;s definition of vivid imagination.&nbsp; By this definition, brain death is not a disorder.&nbsp; Early-stage HIV infection is not a disease.&nbsp; They&#8217;re not causing suffering, right?&nbsp; At least not unless you expand suffering to something like &#8220;eventual diminution of lifespan&#8221;, or &#8220;elimination of the potential for experience of happiness&#8221;. But maybe his argument doesn&#8217;t rely on the suffering bit, or maybe it permits this sort of wide definition. He proceeds to explain why violence is not a disorder: But as a writer for Science recently pointed out, &#8220;Unlike most diseases, it&#8217;s usually not the perpetrator who defines aggression as a problem; it&#8217;s the environment. Violent people may feel they are functioning normally, and some may even enjoy their occasional outbursts and resist treatment.&nbsp; (Emphasis added) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
